I’m a little confused. Don’t we want this to be as transparent as possible to limit conspiracies?
I’m a little confused. Don’t we want this to be as transparent as possible to limit conspiracies?
some injustices are structural
right, except sometimes it’s easier to impose conditions on certain countries than others. for example the US was able to get the previous Indian administration to sign a treaty ceding partial control of their arsenal to them, on threat of sanctions (if I recall correctly). as much as the US might want to do something like that with China, it wouldn’t be anywhere near as easy to pull off.
this is just an example, I’m not attaching moral value to what occurred/occurs
you don’t need to say yes if someone asks you?
can’t you just buy a cheaper USB 3.0 speed cable anyway? or is this a hardware limitation that Apple have put in the port of the phone?
look at mr big spoon here
any effectively decidable system. that’s not quite the same, and doesn’t strictly apply to AI commands
idk man, at no point do any two or more stars fight each other /s
you’d like all other communities to be echo chambers?
every dollar you raise, the fewer customers you get. the point is that you should want to raise the price whenever the relative drop in customers is less than the relative increase in price to maximise profits (where marginal cost is marginal benefit :) )