Yes, you’re punished for saving while those spend all they earned are rewarded. It’s a messed up system.
Yes, you’re punished for saving while those spend all they earned are rewarded. It’s a messed up system.
It’s never enough, soon they’re going to show ads even to you, a paying customer. It’s happening to some streaming providers already, it’s coming to YouTube too, mark my words. Online streaming is turning into cable.
You did see the numbers? I mean, what else do you need?
Not on TV. Who the fuck wants to watch vertical 60second videos on a 16:9 TV?
It boggles my mind it’s forced upon us even on the TV app
No, the best decision would be if they allowed us to disable shorts.
I pay for mobile bandwidth, it shouldn’t matter to the carrier how I use it.
It would be the same as your ISP charging you extra for going to YouTube website.
Maybe theirs didn’t, some other countries’ did (and still do) because it advances their interest.
I love all my fellow Russians and Ukrainians who rise above the brainwashing that this commenter is demonstrating.
Fuck patriotism and slogans, that’s what politicians want you to do to die for them. All wars would be over in a day if people just realized this as politicians can’t fight their wars without people like this commenter.
Rolls off the tongue, doesn’t it?
The relaunched version aims to combine the nostalgia of the original Winamp with cutting-edge enhancements, such as integration with streaming platforms, cloud syncing
Noooo!
TIL if you’re against pointless wars you’re a “right wing loser”. I thought liberals were for peace.
I don’t need a social network in a village, I’ll just step out of my house and yell.
I never buy any appliances with WiFi or any IoT shit, I draw a hard line there. That shit is cancer.
Touche. Not dictating anything, just pointing out the obvious that when you sign up at an instance, the admin still has full control.
Which is why we shouldn’t get instances grow too large as then we have the same issue as any centralized platform.
It would be great if that was the way it worked, unfortunately right now it’s granular to the instance level, not user level. Not sure it’s even possible to get it down to user level unless every user runs their own instance which is unlikely to ever happen. The data has to live somewhere, so we need instances or instance -equivalent to host the data. Maybe if they get it down to where hosting your own instance is super easy one-click ordeal. Then each user would be truly in control.
Yeah, it would be nice to have a capability to move all your user content to another instance.
You’re in no position dictate what an instance should or should not do. If you don’t like what an instance is doing, you’re welcome to join another one or start your own, that’s the beauty of decentralization.
Right? Jews aren’t completely harmless
Just shows that men are better at everything, even being women.