Which LLM are you running on your macbook?

And while you say this, this thread is full of people claiming it is actually very simple. sigh

Feast your heart on this:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick_culling

Sure, but even so you’re nudging people in a direction that may or may not be the right direction. Some justification for advice is in order, right? I don’t know, perhaps @figaro@lemdro.id is a social psychologist who has spent years researching this topic?

I don’t know. Some justification for your advice maybe? I know you intend well, but I am genuinely wondering how you know whether your advice is right and why you feel qualified to give advice.

Just one thing, you can say dating apps all suck, but I found my wife on a dating app, so maybe weave that into your story as well if possible :)

I couldn’t really find scientific research to back this claim up. Can you elaborate and back your claims up?

That seems like super generic advice. Why would you give it to anyone? Are you more qualified somehow than the people you give it to?

Every HP printer I owned over the last two decades was a huge pile of crap. I hate printers now and will never buy one ever again. I go to the library to print.

And this is where I stop communicating with you. Maybe you should reflect on why it is so important to you to be right about something that is so destructive to the planet. Something you want to deny, but don’t want to supply any sources for. While at the same time every comment I have written you is backed by sources. You’re an asshole.

You’d be fine with it being 100% even if it only needs to be 3% or 4% instead of 20%? Nice.

Nice projection. I am not shifting blame, but since you’ve said this it shows you’re obviously dealing with some massive cognitive dissonance. I have only been providing facts and sources dude. Animal agriculture is a massive source of problems for the planet. Besides all the things I have already told you: what do you think the leading causes of mass extincition, deforestation and global ocean and freshwater eutrophication are? Right…

You can disagree all you want, but climate scientists say it is so:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/20/vegan-diet-cuts-environmental-damage-climate-heating-emissions-study https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/news/201603-plant-based-diets/

Perhaps you might want to start citing sources?

Like what? What do people need that they can’t get from a vegan diet?

I know they’ve changed their name, but they’ve not changed their position.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27886704/

I already told you it is true, but it means nothing. Animal agriculture is still an incredibly big part of the problem fucking up the planet right now. I think I have supplied you with enough data for that by now. Maybe read it?

I meant it in the context of agriculture. Out of the 20% global emissions caused by agriculture, most of it is caused by animal agriculture. I believe the stat is 18%.

Have you stopped and wondered how big a land mass the size of the US, China, Australia and the EU combined is? I am not sure how many shopping malls you have in mind.

Yes it is true, but it still is a moot point because “producing 1 kg of boneless meat still requires an average of 2.8 kg human-edible feed.”

It’s not patronising. It is just stating a fact.

https://www.andeal.org/vault/2440/web/JADA_VEG.pdf

If you could free up a land mass the size of the US, China, Australia and the EU combined, don’t you think we could plants some trees?