kewjo

adding some i always found unique or interesting

• Flashback
• Cyborg Justice
• Ecco the Dolphin
• James Pond
• road rash
• Skitchin’
• General Chaos
• streets of rage (i liked 2 the most)
• Combat Cars
• Bonanza brothers
• World of illusion
• Quackshot
• Sunset Riders
• Action Fighter (i swear this isn’t a fighting game, it’s about evolving motor vehicles)

i would say it’s the fault of whoever thought it was a good idea to hook it up to their data. the workers are just doing what they’re paid to do and trying to put up with literal insanity or risk termination.

funny if true as the only answer an llm could give is “Don’t smoke” or one of many folk remedies. I’m starting to think the people working on them have no clue how they actually work. are the majority working there just prompt engineers without real technical knowledge?

they need buffs from the Etsy witches

from my point of view it feels like most people are willing to trade their cognitive function for being lazy, which is a boundary i never want to cross.

AI will produce a lot of code but most of it is pretty poor quality as most training data is going to be poor quality code, there’s just always going to be more bad code than good to begin with just due to how difficult quality code really is to produce. I’ll give a hint, good code is usually small and succinct.

since my work started pushing AI live site issues have increased dramatically. turns out the person using AI looks like they have a ton more productivity but in reality that just shifts to whoever is reviewing the code. and to those who will say its the developer’s responsibility to review the code, yeah no shit, but if you ever work corporate you realize most don’t care as long as their managers think they are productive and just blame others for being bottlenecks.

Overall it just enlightened me to how bad the average developer really is, but i guess obtaining mediocrity is the sacrifice to make in the name of “productivity”.

for the people that doubt this I’ll share my first hand experience. i grew up in a very religious conservative house. i got into an argument when i was a teenager with my dad about my own personal autonomy. basically about not being allowed to do things that actually make my life more positive, like having friends he disapproved of or listening to the music i liked. afterwards i talked to my mother about how she puts up with him and his controlling behavior. she basically said, ‘you and i are his property we have to do what he says because God.’ that was the day i left religion and conservative ideas; realized it was all just about having power over others.

he gives a pretty reasonable solution at the end? basically his point is the implementation is problematic and causes churn for everyone who uses git and if the concern is really about security then they would allow swapping out the verification hash instead of hard coding it again and waiting for 256 to be broken.

next Nuremberg, “but the AI told me they were a baddy and I was just following orders”

The moron’s won, remember LLMs are just prediction machines. if you see AI as intelligence then you really just fall left of the bell curve

I’ve felt similar in the past but I’ve come to see it more as trying to spark interest. as a child of the 90s the thing that got me into the sciences was how cool it was portrayed in the media, from bill nye to movies like hackers.

make science and education cool again!

I’m starting a religion, reality is a simulation and we are all AI, therefore IP rights don’t apply to anyone who holds that religious belief?

he wears a bullet proof vest over it

does it come with a good stop watch?

how do you measure 1/4 of a second of spray?

not to mention remote exploitation basically means anyone could control it inside your house. what could go wrong?

i don’t think he has that emotion, everything is just an object to him.

it’s one of those things that people need to ask about things they are an expert at so they can understand how valuable the results really are.

but have you thought about convincing your friends to ignore that to make Epic more money?

back to the future got it pretty right

5g is rebranded 4g during the rollout for 4g most providers couldn’t hit the bandwidth targets so they branded things 4g LTE or 4g+ to denote it wasn’t actual 4g. when they caught up and could actually support 4g they realized everyone thought lte or + were better because of course more things = better so they just changed it to 5g