jsnfwlr

This is where a challenger could easily dethrone etsy, taking away their first mover advantage by creating a maker’s marketplace with a strict no-AI policy and heavy human moderation.

I don’t know why you’ve been down voted. This is the way businesses operate. They either tell you the reason for an added fee or they hide it in a price increase.

That’s true as long as none of the apps you use as a user have the compromised packages bundled with them…

Well, in a way most of the AI hype is a thirst trap for CEOs - like that you can easily replace office workers with chatbots or that software developers will become 10x more efficient and consequently you can fire 90% of your workforce.

This isn’t about securing sites or content. It is just for poisoning the data AI scrapers steal by obfuscating the readily accessible information.

If you read the article or the ShieldFont website, it works pretty well when you use their React widget, even from an accessibility stand point.

Xbox has its own CEO, it is its own company, wholly owned by Microsoft. Xbox then also owns other companies like Mojang, Zenimax Media, Activision Blizzard … They own companies too… Its companies all the way down. This way if one fails, it’s bankruptcy doesn’t take down the whole chain.

I agree - there is a big difference between being socially shunned for being an asshole or vocalising contempt and being publicly outed and then criminally punished for it.

If they didn’t think of it as a possibility during their research, they should be ashamed of themselves.

Vilification is the act of speaking or writing abusively and negatively about someone or something in an effort to lower others’ opinions of them. In a legal and human rights context, it refers to public behavior or hate speech that incites hatred, severe ridicule, or serious contempt towards individuals or groups based on their identity.

Differs from libel/slander which is false and negative speach/writing about someone in that vilification doesn’t necessarily have to be proven false, just abusively framed.

I know in Western Australia, where I live, it is illegal to have the phone resting on any part of your body.

https://www.wa.gov.au/organisation/road-safety-commission/mobile-phones-and-distractions

I wonder where the line is drawn between on your lap vs in your pocket. By that I mean, what if it is in a clear pouch on a lanyard around your neck, or in a running-armband. In both those cases it could still be used by need not have been touched while the car is driving.

AI … that’s why it cites Georgia law.

Esp feather will take 5v directly, and usually has a USB port on it

If they’re offering “free Starlink WiFi” they are telling you who is offering it. If they are offering “free inflight WiFi” they are hiding it

Where did you see the battery? I don’t see one mentioned anywhere

Could just use wallabag …

They wrote nonsense. They don’t need an apologist.

Given that android runs on dual screen/flip/folding phones, that makes even less sense

That’s great for the US, but these companies are fucking the whole planet. What will the US do when other countries hold them responsible?

You can use the truth to mock people

Rather US centric view there. What’ll happen to the majority of the world’s population?