

181·
26 days agoThis reply has some pretty strong “Git gud, Scrub” Energy. It is not a helpful Thing to suggest, and it’s not exactly “generally … achievable” when the entire society is built around forcing people into Mountains of debt.


This reply has some pretty strong “Git gud, Scrub” Energy. It is not a helpful Thing to suggest, and it’s not exactly “generally … achievable” when the entire society is built around forcing people into Mountains of debt.


It’s a lot like Gumball.
Babies are made…
I think that’s the consistency.
The problem here is that who owns a data center isn’t a matter of breaking the law. It’s only if the data center starts breaking the law, and only then can the lawmaker share that the law is being broken and by whom. It wouldn’t give them carte blanche to go out and say “Microsoft owns that land”.