They found her in a puréed state?
They found her in a puréed state?
“Simply present the relevant evidence. Surely they’ll change then”
pargnobble
Is it a problem if I pay in million-dollar bills?
It has vastly improved it since I, who don’t fit into social structures well, am able to take advantage of the particularly diverse niches of the free market to carve out a living for myself.
Yogurt isn’t very suitable for sales through the mail
But has steamed kale been approved by the FDA for acid reflux?
Perhaps what you’re doing should be made illegal, for safety reasons.
Marketing is ensuring your product offering matches what people want.
I don’t see how an influencer pushing a particular probiotic product fits this
None of those actions feeds the hungry
That’s what OP has done; that’s what we’re seeing in this screenshot.
The back button is highlighted. This list is the list of options OP gets when he right clicks the back button.
As the screenshot illustrates, the redirects have been repeated many times to thwart that strategy.
No, that’s sin. Evil is causing suffering for no reason other than the lulz.
Great now you tell me
And you receive a key ring at key moments in your life, such as upon taking possession of a property or car.
They probably think we’re all speaking German
Sounds like the plot of a 90s video game
The push to require paying to read content that is shared openly on the web is designed to drive a feasibility wedge between large and small operations.
It means that a small handful of organizations will actually have the funds to be able to buy enough training data, and that all other smaller AI ventures will be illegal.
This is designed to concentrate AI power into a few hands.
Think critically about the narratives being fed to you. AIs must be allowed to read the web, because if they are not then we will have a unipolar AI ecosystem and the future of humanity will be extremely dark.
We need a multipolar AI ecosystem and the only way to do that is to have lots of small players making their own AI.
If we have a multipolar AI ecosystem, then AI will be forced to play nice because of the effects of parity, and therefore AI will develop along a prosocial, negotiating, respectful path.
Unipolar AI will be tyrannical, cruel, and evil. Unipolar AI will be the result of making it illegal to train AI on web content.
Please see past the propagandistic narrative. Today it is OpenAI that is fighting for this right. Tomorrow it will be smaller players. That is a good thing. That is what we want.
The Democratic party is running a candidate without a primary.
Not from an ASCII
smooth