For porn (in most of the us), the goal is geolocation spoofing to avoid ID requirements, not anonymity.

That said, I doubt edge achieves even that, since they likely keep their servers in the states. I was more talking about VPNs broadly.

I use one for Usenet, but maybe I’m too cautious.

If you’re at home or whatever it offers effectively no benefits

Porn.

Also my ISP sniffs packets enough to send copyright complaints, so I’d rather outsource that exposure to a country with privacy laws.

To be fair, the US still has the best smoked beef products.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

I don’t think they’re talking about the comparative sizes of the groups.

He was using the term in its narrower anti-Jewish sense, not its more modern “any genocidal maniac” sense.

No longer elbows up

It’s time for Chi Chis Up!

I may need to cut my poops into bite-size pieces. Gonna need a new poop knife.

I am, but not on a Tesla.

It won’t get a chance; I’m not making an account.

I have a feeling trump is willing to call the “Denmark will put boots on the ground to forcibly expel/kill the invaders” (what I unfortunately suspect would be a) bluff.

I don’t know what kind of authority Greenland / Denmark would have to expel all US personnel from Greenland, but given there are US military bases there, I imagine there might be some contractual issues.

Ask Cuba how that went.

Younger siblings playing Mario on the second controller in one-player mode.

But then you have to unplug it for duck hunt.

His tramp stamps were between the rolls, so I aimed.

Picturing that makes me grimace.

At least until the state starts making early scourges and corsairs.

The subtext works both ways, though. The question is malformed in my example because it implies an incorrect fact, and you rightly bristle at it because of that. But the statement “she’s here legally” is similarly implying a subtly different question that isn’t being asked, and then answering that question instead of the real one. So it made me bristle in the same way. And it’s a technique that’s often used intentionally to dishonestly reframe conversations, especially around contentious topics. The hostile responses seem to be incorrectly (but unfortunately reasonably these days) assuming this intent.

If someone asked you to describe your immigration status, would you say “I’m in the country legally” if you were born there?

Subtext exists, and is pretty important to recognize when it’s used for propaganda.

I understand you weren’t using it that way on purpose.