Not particularly.
If you consider your example, you may have worked hard for it, but another person could’ve worked equally hard at all the right things and never have gotten the opportunity to even attempt getting into university. We might call that luck. Someone else might call it God’s doing. Regardless, it’s just a different name for the same thing.
We don’t have enough structured data in this domain to be able to use anything other than LLMs. At least, not in the timeframe of OP’s hypothetical.
When is freedom of speech ever not equivalent to freedom of consequences from said speech?
OP is asking how to solve a problem. You understand that repeating the problem does not answer the question, right?
I don’t understand where this question is coming from. The premise of this question is that “literally” is ambiguous. That its meaning is unclear. How does an ambiguous word add clarity to a sentence?
Obviously, you use the word that expresses what you intend to express. The question is what that word would be when you want to express “literally” in the strict dictionary definition sense without ambiguity.
You know of a word that satisfies OP’s criteria and you’re not going to share it?
And we’re constantly doing this. If a word is used a lot and the word is long, we’re going to shorten it.
That will last the average adult about 20 days, and you’ll probably be constantly feeling hungry during that time. Adding a sack of dry beans would make a huge difference.
Vitamins degrade over time. You’ll want to make sure that what you get will actually last for the period of time when you intend to use them.
LLMs are still a facet of AI though. It sounds like they’re saying it shouldn’t be categorized as AI at all.
Or any task change really. You tell me that I’m here for a writing task, then halfway through it becomes a math test? There’s no way I’m doing anywhere near as well as if they told me what was happening ahead of time.
“Imaginary” is one way to put it.
I like to think of it as a number reflecting how much of our labour they have reserved for themselves. When that wealth “disappears”, it basically means that we get that labour back for ourselves. So in a way, it actually gets split evenly amongst all of us.
Except for that one time I actually needed a key made. Went to a place with blanks displayed on the wall and they told me they didn’t make them anymore because they didn’t have anyone who knew how to use the machine.
These kinds of small wording differences are one of the most common ways for news outlets to intentionally spread misinformation. If you already know what the current laws are, you’ll know what actually happened. Otherwise, “declines to block” tells you that there exists pressure to prevent something that is currently allowed. “Allows” tells you that it wasn’t previously allowed without their approval and they granted that approval.
It could either allow or disallow […]. There isn’t an in-between.
So in summary, there are exactly four "in-between"s.
Which would map to each of the following respectively
What you’re saying is that it should map to
Which, besides being inconsistent with how those words are used in every day English, also reduces how much information you receive.
“Local man allows wife to eat dinner.”
vs
“Local man declines to block wife from eating dinner.”
The meaning is very different.
I don’t understand the problem with the car in front doing a U-turn. How does that increase the probability of rear-ending or missing a light? Even if it were a regular turn, some people turn faster and some slower, some people take longer to respond to a light change, and some wait for a larger clearance in oncoming traffic before turning. Whatever they decide to do, you just follow their lead.
And you’re saying that those two things are somehow contradictory? Because if so, I don’t see how. If this super intelligent computer knows how you’re going to choose ahead of time, then it must also know how the coin is going to land ahead of time.
I don’t know what you’re getting at. Did I say something to suggest I misunderstood this part?
Twitch is owned by Amazon