- 51 Posts
- 67 Comments
3·16 days agoThat’s awesome, thanks for sharing
141·21 days agoWooow, I didn’t know any of this. Thanks for the detailed explanation
3·24 days agoMy pc uses DDR2 and it runs Linux with no problem. I can even game, just not the new ones
16·1 month agoThis “ceasefire” is only for the media, just like the Cambodia x Thailand ceasefire.
Nobody expects…
33·3 months agoFirst of all, blowing up a boat like is illegal. Even if it was legal you’ll have to prove that the boat contained drugs, but you just blowed your evidences! The guys that survived the attack then would have no charges over them and would be set free. Probably these guys were innocent and the boat was not a drug boat, thus they killed them as a cover up
According to the International Energy Agency, the world’s data-crunching infrastructure is set to consume as much electricity by 2030 as the entire nation of Japan. Data centers also require enormous amounts of water for cooling—each day, a single 1-megawatt data center consumes as much water as about 1,000 people living in the developed world, World Economic Forum data suggests.
Also, goodbye stars, only datacenters and space junk now.
This article is more relevant in the context of the latest declarations of Antonio Guterrez:
Se the dabate here: https://slrpnk.net/post/29426682
The good news is that it is still something we can deal with. I mean, to just give up is to let the current “owners of the world win” ( billionaires and gang).
Spectrum makes this seems a very positive way of “bringing power gaps”, but the social consequences of living nearby multiple engines running 24/7 are terrible. This video describes a "town that elon musk is poisoning "
More on this subject:
“We Went to the Town Elon Musk Is Poisoning”
“We Found the Hidden Cost of Data Centers. It’s in Your Electric Bill”
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman hinted as much with a January post on his personal blog. Altman wrote he was “now confident we know how to build AGI as we have traditionally understood it,” adding that 2025 would be the year AI agents “materially change the output of companies.”
These guys are such a joke, but they are the ones laughing $.
5·7 months agoBut when?
Some countries want to sell the image of “China is the absolute evil”, thus from this logic everything “good” must equal something very evil.
Dr. Joseph Pierre, a psychiatrist at the University of California, previously told Futurism that this is a recipe for delusion.
“What I think is so fascinating about this is how willing people are to put their trust in these chatbots in a way that they probably, or arguably, wouldn’t with a human being,” Pierre said. “There’s something about these things — it has this sort of mythology that they’re reliable and better than talking to people. And I think that’s where part of the danger is: how much faith we put into these machines.”
Says the bot
I doubt it
Why DeepSeek?
Yes, you’re right about restricted content from Google and other search companies; but the point that I was trying to make is that if we rely on AI as a source of information, it will become more and more difficult to obtain the primary font of that information.
There’s another side to that too: AI can “poison the well”, that is, create 24/7 misinformation and spread it on the web so that searching becomes unpractical, and then the AI can be sold as the answer to that problem.
I mean, companies are putting a ton of money in this AI hype, it’s almost "too big to fail ". These same companies will begin to destroy and create problems in our current infrastructure so that they can sell the solution.
They want to dumb down Wikipedia