I’m sure it’s possible but I suspect it’s simply not cost effective.
Removing grease requires hot water, harsh solvents, and scrubbing. If you’ve ever cleaned an oven or bbq or whatever I’m sure you’d agree that it would be very difficult to automate.
I don’t understand the question.
You have a vending machine in a train station cooking greasy popcorn all day. Is there a machine that can clean that ?
Baked on greasy-buttery-ness is very difficult to clean.
Is that really what’s happening in the picture OP posted? Like someone puts foil wrapped morsels of… food in there once a week and the machine just keeps a couple hot and ready to go?
Seems very unappealing.
That said here in Australia the food you get at gas stations / road houses is more or less the same, just that there’s a person to heat it up and hand it to you.
Needs to be cleaned every day.
This isn’t even on the radar, there’s no support for this at this time. Just a few nutters got an audience with the king and now there’s an article about it.
Same in Australia.
This is the answer.
Writing a playbook is authoritarian.
God that fucking bot.
The bot itself is only mildly offensive, but the fieflord bot-love is just repugnant.
About a month ago news did a “feedback about the bot” thing, in which they declared undying love for the bot above all things and declared any input other than breathless support for the bot to be vote manipulated misinformation.
There were about 3 mods involved, all contradicting each other, and themselves, very condescending, and very sooky and sulky. “One of the mods almost resigned over this!” kind of stuff.
You had to start every comment with “look I know you guys are doing your best and investing all your free time as volunteers but…”
Sure, or you could go outside and play on some days.
Obviously this guy is a scum bag but what even is his angle here?
“look at me being punished for breaking this law everyone universally thinks is a great idea”
Imprisonment is always the least-bad option out of a bunch of bad options.
I’m not really into the “send a message” aspect of punishment, I don’t want this guy punished so that others of similar mind fear being punished.
However, I’m glad that his imprisonment clearly demonstrates that our society has resolved that nazism will not be tolerated.
If the price is this idiot being more extremified then so be it.
No one cares about catching specific phishing campaigns.
I gave up on this years ago.
Figuring out how they got hold of your email won’t be very satisfying. It’s not possible, but if it were you would find it’s some obscure forum you signed up for 10 years ago to make the search function work, which hasn’t updated their forum software during that 10 years, and is now leaking email addresses.
Point is, the horse has already bolted and now your email address is on the lists that get sold on the dark net. There’s no going back.
My understanding with spam / phishing is that most email providers will identify and remove 95% of it. gmail will catch 99.9% just because of the volume of emails going through their servers. I personally would pry my eyes out with a fork before using gmail so I’m stuck receiving 5% of spam. It’s nothing really. Every day (or several days) I look at my inbox, action and archive as appropriate, and delete the rest. It literally takes less than 1 second because I would have to “delete the rest” anyway.
As others have mentioned, “catch-all” email addresses are one method to kind of mitigate or manage the problem, but ultimately I’ve found it to be a cool trick but ultimately inconvenient and maybe pointless.
I think you’re pretty much talking about the fundamental attribution error. It’s a cognitive bias whereby we interpret the actions of others as the result of their character, but attribute our own behavior to external situational things.
I think another component of this is generalisation, like how often does someone have to do mean things to qualify as “an asshole”. Once in a lifetime? Once a year? Every day? All day?
I used to think I was a super nice person. These days I will absolutely acknowledge that there are times when people would think I was a bit of an asshole. I think sometimes it’s unavoidable if you don’t want to be everyone’s door mat. For example, when you disagree with someone sometimes you can just let it go to keep the peace, but if you feel strongly about it for whatever reason and have to stand your ground, it’s easy to end up looking like an asshole.
They want $100 a barrel. Russia is selling too much at say $90 a barrel. If the Saudis flood the market so it’s only $80 a barrel, it will really fuck Russia’s shit up.
Saudis are hoping Russia starts playing their game with the price fixing.
In Thailand they ban the major progressive party after nearly every election. Usually they’ve already formed another party even before the ban comes down. Often the party leaders are excluded but it doesn’t achieve much and creates the perception that they’re persecuted.
This is the answer.
Also what types of employers. Large companies vs small business.
Yeah.
A lot of commenters have unrealistic expectations, as though anything less than burning capitalism to the ground is unacceptable.
How dare she allow the country’s largest source of revenue to continue producing oil.
I would prefer a president with a doctorate in climate science than one without.
This isn’t really what OP is talking about.
We really can’t see very well at all outside of the centre of our focus. this paper says 6 degrees, I heard this as a coin held at arms length.
Our minds “render” most of the rest of what we think we see.
You’re right that we discard most of our sensory inputs, but with visual inputs there’s much less data than it appears.
This is a non-article.
They’re not just going to delete the settings menu.
They’re trying to improve the UX the same way they’ve been doing since the first phone. Improve settings, make some predictive depending on your usage. Not a big deal.