Probably money. Given enough money, I’m sure tiktok will ban any search term
Probably money. Given enough money, I’m sure tiktok will ban any search term
Woah there. This is a political post on a social media site.
You better stop with those non rage inducing comments.
People are dumb.
This reminds me of a saying an old programming mentor told me.
“To a kid with a hammer, everything is a nail”
I don’t think they want to do that anyway. If fox isn’t being put on blast, CNN is next.
There are no consequences for just about anything if you have enough money :)
The communists I know all use lemmy
I mean if you want to be all sensible about it, sure.
It’s just a tool. The real scam is that the 1% pay such a low share of their actual income (including capital gains)
Tbh it kind of is as long as you’re fluent in assembly
If they choose where their donated money goes, it’s still capitalism
BuT coORPEratIOns arE PeOplE
“In collectives” gives me big brave new world vibes.
Literally the comment I was going to write
Regulation doesn’t automatically mean better.
You can make regulations that benefit large real estate corporations and that’s still regulation.
We have a lot of that in the parts of US. There are rules encouraging landlords to keep high rental rates bc if they lowered it, they’d have to offer that to other renters as well. Many landlords choose to have empty rooms and keep that high rental rate.
Bias and obvious bias
Income tax
You have no idea why? Really? It’s to get people thinking about / trying bing.
It’s all advertising.
We’re going to enter another search engine (read chatbot) war.
Governments like to assume that once something is illegal , it’ll just stop within their borders
I don’t think you’re right about nvidia. Their hardware is used for SO much more than AI. They’re fine.
Plus their own AI products are popping off rn. DLSS and their frame generation one (I forget the name) are really popular in the gaming space.
I think they also have a new DL-based process for creating stencils for silicon photolithography which, in my limited knowledge, seems like a huge deal.
Looks like they got that number from this quote from another arstechnica article ”…OpenAI admitted that its AI Classifier was not “fully reliable,” correctly identifying only 26 percent of AI-written text as “likely AI-written” and incorrectly labeling human-written works 9 percent of the time”
Seems like it mostly wasn’t confident enough to make a judgement, but 26% it correctly detected ai text and 9% incorrectly identified human text as ai text. It doesn’t tell us how often it labeled AI text as human text or how often it was just unsure.
EDIT: this article https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/openai-discontinues-its-ai-writing-detector-due-to-low-rate-of-accuracy/