*eye-roll

The two, famously habitual liars claimed to be able to cheat the voting system and you believed them. Do you have any proof or is it more of the same hand-waving bullshit?

What, are they shipping it in direct so they have more excuses on why they’re interfering in November?

I mean yeah, but this is a decision that the hospitals made to try and get more reimbursement for the same care. The fact that an insurer is tattling on them is telling, though. “How dare you try to take more money from us when we’re trying to take more money from you!” Is the energy, what with AI being used to supercharge denials from the insurer’s side.

Just a thought, but maybe we don’t use rape in this context?

Stop doing the Zionists work for them, OP. Antisemitism isn’t synonymous with antizionism. Based on the wording of the program, this is aimed at actual antisemitism and won’t be a shield that Zionist New Yorkers can use to bash dissenters with.

Edit: spending money on the people of New York is what the mayor’s office is supposed to do. Sending stuff to a foreign country is above and beyond the call, so maybe keep those things in mind when you want to compare things.

AI looks like bland shit. Anyone drawing something by hand gets infinity more points than the slop machine.

You’ve already made it pretty clear that you find the idea repugnant, so what’s the point in asking? You want to moral grandstand that you’re better than those people?

They said they’re single issue, this is their single issue. If the choice is no vote or vote for third party, voting for third party says something more than not voting. Do I vote harm reduction? Yes. Am I going to argue a person out of voting rather than voting for a third-party? No. Do I think I can change this person’s mind to agree to vote harm reduction? No, and if you’re being honest you know you can’t either. We do what we can. Optimal strategy and the best strategy for an individual don’t need to be the same thing all of the time.

If every person who was going to not vote voted third party instead, things would change for the better.

You voted third-party. Good. Infinitely better than not voting

I get it, but that’s not how elections under FPTP works. If you want to be single issue about this, you have to vote for a candidate aligned with your choice on this. If such a candidate doesn’t exist, you have to vote for the least repugnant one.

If you don’t vote, you’re cosigning whatever choice everyone else makes. You not voting isn’t telling anyone that they didn’t get your vote, it’s telling everyone that you didn’t care about the outcome of that election.

Don’t. Don’t ever let the size of the group determine your support. All people deserve to live without fear of persecution (real persecution, not modern Christian persecution, mind)

It’s zionists. They’ve always been racist.

They can now charge for access to the strait.

Yes. The justice system in Mississippi, infamous for its fairness to the black community. I await their decision with bated breath.

Black people, and this cannot be stated enough, would never knowingly inflict the horrors of lynching upon their community, doubly so in the south. If you see a hanging, assume hate crime until you have extreme evidence otherwise.

His doctor will be tagging along, making sure he feels healthy and coherent. Picture of doctor:

Well, yes, but it’s really the fact that the “Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you” ad campaign was identified as the most influential of the 2024 campaign season. They, again, think fear mongering is why that campaign worked. It wasn’t, it worked cause Harris was running status quo in a time of social upheaval and that ad readily showcased that in a novel way.

And the list of democrats to jackboots!

Sidestepping federal authority over the USPS. When the feds want to ratfuck, find a way around?

Yeah, but like everything he does, he’ll half-ass it and that probably won’t be enough