

It’s pretty much as clean going into the pipe as it is coming out. Water pipes are kept pressurized so that any cracks or breaks push water out instead of letting contaminants in.
Seer of the tapes! Knower of the episodes!


It’s pretty much as clean going into the pipe as it is coming out. Water pipes are kept pressurized so that any cracks or breaks push water out instead of letting contaminants in.


The problem is that an AI built to maximize paperclips might conclude that converting the planet to paperclips is an acceptable cost of maximizing paperclip production. It might understand why humans think it’s bad to convert the planet, but disagree. It would need to be explicitly programmed to prioritize human life over paperclips.
otherwise we would just switch it off
If it were super-intelligent, it could probably trick us into leaving it turned on.


A paperclip maximizer driven by self-preservation? What could possiblie go wrong?
Who grades the test? Who judges the competition?


Yes


No, it’s “re” like the subject of an email. “Re: diculous”


30 years ago my music teacher told me that in Chinese-language singing it’s the consonants that are sustained.


Are there examples of censorship or prior restraint you’d like to highlight?


“I have too much self respect and dignity, love my family way too much, and do not want my sweet district to have to endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the President we all fought for, only to fight and win my election while Republicans will likely lose the midterms,” she wrote in a statement.
She could just not run for re-election if that’s what she’s actually worried about. Resigning early doesn’t make sense.


It may be possible…
It may not be necessary…


Vibes of newgrounds.com circa 2005


“Make out” makes out so many things.


A Nintendo64 with several game cartridges. It’s a little flaky, but it still works for the most part.


I’ve still got my Nintendo 64, and I sometimes boot up Goldeneye for old time’s sake.


It could certainly be used as evidence in your favor. Whether it by itself would be enough to exonerate you would depend on things like the evidence against you and how much weight the jury gave to your records.


These are known as souvenir plots. Generally, you aren’t buying the land, but rather you’re buying a contractual right to prevent the actual owner from developing the land.


Californian. No.
It wouldn’t solve any problems that can’t be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven’t had to worry about before. It’d be a net loss for everyone involved.
Start saving for old age now. It might seem like a long way off, and you might not have much money right now to begin with, but being young and poor is way better than being old and poor.