Oh right, I thought it was actually part of the guidelines it was spewing.

At least it’s something it generated and not how the prompt geniuses tried to make that thing comply, I guess.

Still, yeah, awkward how stupid the “internal monologue” sounds and how it ends up getting ignored anyway.

You know how scientific this whole shit is when half the system prompt is “Wait, read the instructions again” a dozen times.

And It’s still not actually following this mess in the end.

So now the AI is not good enough?

They’re that close to an epiphany. Maybe.

It’s either written by a LLM that’s been instructed to drag the little info it had forever, or written by a human that is very convincing at producing robotic, unnaturally articulated text.

Title, summary, first paragraph are basically the same sentence slightly reformulated, and then the rest is going back to every bit of it like a list of bullet points, almost failing to add anything valuable.

I found it painful to parse, and it really does not feel human-like.

Boo hoo, turns out gen AI sucks and becomes way too expensive once the real costs start being passed down to users.

And I mean “start”, because between wild speculation and outright theft of both natural and cultural resources it’s still very far from paying what it owes.

We were promised the reign of the basilisk, instead we just get anthropic people whining.

Le Chonk

Enough with this shit, you’re not being cute, Mistral.

I agree with the figurative image of the spark to describe something gen AI-produced slop lacks.

Figuratively, because we all know you’re actually being literal and make it about that bullshit you call “soul”. Sorry Christians, this still doesn’t exist.

All very good reasons, but I am also adding loss of skill and opportunities for juniors to learn, and AI often being dangerously incompetent at some tasks and everyone rejecting the responsibility when it is.

And then there is the extensive use of gen AI-produced slop effortlessly invading every space and making everything suck.

No, almost nobody "fearing* AI believes Ultron or Skynet will literally enslave/wage war on humanity. If anything I’m sure the ones who believe the most in AI superintelligence supplanting humans are mostly among AI advocates.

I do go to fast-food once in a while, but in my experience McDonald’s is really the worst of them, mediocre is too generous. Not any cheaper for basically cardboard.

I’m in a local administration in France, it’s rapidly getting closer to home… Our higher-ups somehow decided a thourough Microsoft integration was a good idea like 5 years ago.

Seems like we’re just one political comment about support to the ICC to be in the same situation. And I mean, fuck it, we should be. But I am not happy about the shit we’ll have to go through to purge it all now.

Give it about six months to a year I’d say.

Oh, wait, you were asking about the collapse of civilization, right?

Good point, it also sounds like a recipe for disaster.

I blame vibe-coding. Windows has always been Windows, but I agree it’s been extra shit lately.

What, 45? Like, people who saw that shit start when they were well into their thirties? Is that a thing?

Feels very late to hop on that bandwagon.

I feel like raspberry has been backstabbing everyone for a while.

“Stop being political!” say the people running the manufactured hate machine.

You know the thing where AI companies describe their alignment direction as “Honest, Harmless, Helpful”?

The only one that’s marketable to the idiots buying AI services is Helpful. So that’s always top priority even when it goes against the other two.

Average decider wouldn’t stand an “assistant” that sometimes answers “I don’t know”. So instead agent providers train their already hallucination-prone model to be 100% confident in whatever it says. Who cares if it’s true if it looks like it is?

Your username with that conclusion paints a very funny picture.

I miss the time when sunglasses made you look cool. Fuck you, Zuckerberg.