no its fine, they changed it with amendments. surely over the years they’ve had a bunch of changes

only 27 amendments

the 18th and 21st amendments just cancel each other out

the most recent amendment was 34 years ago, and was proposed in 1789

yep, amendments are keeping up with the times

Favorite: McDonald’s

Least Favorite: Also McDonald’s

seems like you sorta went off the headline and not the content as the entire article talks about emotional health and regulation.

obviously lead is not an advantageous difference, but it’s also disingenuous to imply it’s the difference in generations.

but do they really whistle? I was under the impression they flap/clap together, which I think is distinct from a whistle

You’re talking about the account that has AI in its name?

Ah, but you’re calculating the area, so it would be length * width, not just multiplying by 2.

So you’re looking at 25 at the bottom and 49 at the top, making your average 37 per layer.

Not sure where you’d land at 12 nuts per layer on average. If you go off 5 nuts “wide” as your diameter you’d end up with at least 20 nuts at the bottom layer (area = π(5/2)² = 19.6).

Just because I’m curious, is the fact that this is a “risky gamble” concerning to you? Or that a lawsuit such as this is expected to be drawn out, likely putting a large deterrent on less affluent victims from seeking justice?

what

I thought being religiously motivated also would qualify as a hate crime? Or is the implication that one’s religion is also immutable?

I don’t love to defend advertising/marketing, but your statement implies that once something has been advertised, organic interest/enjoyment becomes impossible.

Sure, there might’ve been a big ad push that rocketed mayo to the top of people’s condiment lists. But there are dozens of other things that could also create interest (new foods that pair well with it, new recipes that are shared culturally, loss of a competing product, diet changes)

I’m unfamiliar with the mineral rights treaty specifics, but I remember it being said that it was a pretty shite deal for Ukraine anyway, and that it likely wouldn’t have been signed anyway

I only went back to read the comment because you told me you upvoted it. I wanted to make sure it was worthy.

!it was!<

Agreed. Not sure it’s quite $100k cool, but still cool.

There’s no reason that guilt would be absent from helpinghelp a specific person in need (like your struggling mother example). Plenty of people feel guilty taking handouts and will outright refuse help when they might need it.

As for the drive thru thing, I think you might be talking about something different than what I’ve seen/done, which is just paying for your own meal and the people behind you. There isn’t any expectation for them to continue some chain, and in many ways it’s a bit of an empty gesture (they are just taking that first person’s goodwill and passing it to the next in line).

My interpretation of paying it forward is the premise of receiving something when you’re in need, then, when you’re able, to give something back. Not to the one who helped you, as that would be repaying a debt.

not a typo

puplic

This amuses me

Do they need a “strategy” when the whole point of a primary is to find a suitable candidate?

In the same way that watching porn on public transit is a social no-no

I think you’re taking it the wrong way. I understand it as “anything negative about Biden, is also true about Trump”

• Biden is old, so is Trump
• Biden struggles speaking cohesively, so does Trump
• etc.

It’s just a population map