It’s not a cure-all - it’s just better than the alternative.

Moderate inflation encourages investment since your money losses value if stuffed into a mattress.

You want money to be “moving”.

I wonder what pigeon shit is going to do to it? Seems too fragile to clean with pressure washers.

A sexual predator in Mexico was emboldened enough to grope the president in front of reporters.

And E. Jean Carroll did sue (and won a settlement from) Trump for sexual assault.

Let’s not do the “every nation is better than the US about everything now” thing.

“It was the promise of a country that would not promote the LGBT agenda. We liked the fact that LGBT is basically outlawed here in official ways,”

Addition though subtraction.

I kinda miss barrens chat…

deleted by creator

“I know you are but what am I?”

🙄

Fascist.

Fascist.

I already answered your question, free speech is regulated everywhere, it’s a moronic question, but I refuse to accept your rhetoric, as it has nothing to do with pleasure, that’s a loaded question.

I mean - you have completely agreed with me. You just like to phrase it in a way that is more weasel-wordy.

Again: If an extreme religion is against what we stand for as a society, why then is it more wrong to ban a religion than to ban Nazism?

Let me piss you off by answering your question with yet another question - who is determining what is a “religion that is against what we stand for as a society”. And let me remind you who the current US president is.

how is this fascist apologia not banned on .world?

Man, MAGA sure hates free speech.

Free speech is not absolute, and I live in probably the only country in the world that actually tried that!

So it’s at the pleasure of the state then?

If a extreme religion is against what we stand for as a society, why then is it more wrong to ban a religion than to ban Nazism?

Gotcha - free speech is at the pleasure of the state then?

What I said was the religion shouldn’t be allowed “special” pleading. Not that they can’t have rights.

So perhaps I misunderstood when you said they don’t have a right to exist (e.g. can be banned)?

But somehow it’s not OK to ban extreme religion for the exact same reasons.

But Israel is fighting against an extremist and verifiably dangerous religious sect (Hamas). Surely that is righteous given your above comments?

And I’ll just leave this here. It’s well cited so follow sources if you like.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China

But somehow it’s not OK to ban extreme religion for the exact same reasons.

Like Israel is doing in Gaza?

You can’t post about JD Vance because that bloated face meme hurt his feelings.

Oh you can’t? Are you afraid for your life after having posted this then? Exactly which journalist has been imprisoned for re-sharing it?

She went missing in Wuhan in May 2020. It later emerged that she had been taken by the Chinese authorities and detained in Shanghai, where she was convicted of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” after a sham trial. Zhang Zhan was released on 13 May 2024 after completing a four-year prison sentence.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/09/china-journalist-zhang-zhan-sentenced-to-prison-again-on-baseless-charges/

People only see black and white. Everything is “completely free” or “it’s all just equally bad.” Sooo frustrating. You have no concept of shades of gray do you?

Many human rights organizations have criticized China’s treatment of minority cultures and ethnicities. Uighurs being the most well known.