That reads as an excuse, “they are not really capitalists” type of argument. Yes, they are. They sell products, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta… They all sell products, they are all capitalists to the very core. It’s just that, one of their products is us.
That part of the support email almost made me puke of how fucking awful it was. “Why complain about ads when you get YouTube Music for free by paying us money”
I really wish I could stop using shit google stuff for work…
It’s only bad if it’s not an USian company, didn’t you get the memo?
You forgot your /s there, friend. Be careful with the Internet these days, reading comprehension is a hard to find skill in this age.
That’d be cool, but compatibility is a huge issue. I’ve looked into buying one, and there’s no model available for my device.
I couldn’t quite understand why people were memeing on Zen 5. It’s 5% performance increase while at much lower TDP, what is there not to like? Efficiency is plenty important. And even if we could see a 20% performance increase while using more power, is that worth it? What are the true benefits of a 20% faster CPU when considering pure gaming while we are already at the top of the spec sheet? The games where the difference would be a massive number of FPS are those like CS2 where you would go from 600 to 720 fps, does that truly matter? I like my pcs running as efficient as possible, that way I know they’ll last longer.
Great! Now bring back phones with physical QWERTY keyboards.
Because a lot of times other people will share things whenever there’s enough controversy? Often things will also show up on the news? Not that uncommon for things on twitter to show up outside twitter?
My pc auto-upgraded because I donwloaded what I thought was just a regular update. I’ve been using 11 for like a year already, and it’s fine. Install powertoys, run christitus utility… The one thing that really bothered me for a while was not having as granular of a control of my taskbar, but that only lasted for like two weeks.
Same! I probably will be replaced just as all the other “meat sacks”, but I hope to at least be given a degree of dignity upon my inevitable demise.
I think of this anytime I see some alleged leftist on Twitter talking about anything as if they were paragons of ethics and morality. It might be a bit of cynicism on my part, but I can’t take it seriously whenever someone can’t take a hint that maybe they shouldn’t be in a platform owned by a Billionaire that makes a point in basing his personality on the fact that he is an imperialist bigot. I wish Twitter had stayed banned in my country…
Really cool that they can plant and harvest fresh vegetables in space. I bet they joked about eating space lettuce and tomato.
There’s a point made at the end of the article that most people seems to have missed entirely:
Existing facilities that can filter carbon dioxide out of the air only have the capacity to capture 0.01 million metric tons of CO2 globally today, costing companies like Microsoft as much as $600 per ton of CO2. That’s very little capacity with a very high price tag.
“We cannot squander carbon dioxide removal on offsetting emissions we have the ability to avoid,” study coauthor Gaurav Ganti, a research analyst at Climate Analytics, said in a press release. The priority needs to be preventing pollution now instead of cleaning it up later.
It’s obviously a matter of “why not both?”, and both the article and the scientists behind the report agree on it. However, a lot of people are betting their eggs on the idea that climate reversal technology will suddenly become a lot more effective and cheaper than it is right now. And sure, that may be the case, or not. For how many years have we heard of flying cars or self-driving autonomous vehicles and predicted that they were just around the corner, at most a few years away, but nada so far? Betting on the invention of a new technology that’ll make a very expensive process today way cheaper is a VERY naive and bad approach.
It’s only illegal when an individual does it, when it’s a giant corporation, it’s called innovation. /s
This article made my day a bit better. Google complaining how “radical” the changes proposed are is a sure indicator that they would likely cause some damage to them.
I’m 29, no kids, and absolutely won’t have any. I won’t be responsible for putting a life on this earth just so they can get fucked over by billionaires and shit politicians. I’ll not give them yet another soul to torture and grind on their machines.
It’s the same old Yankee speech: “is chinese so must be really bad”. They’re definitely no worse than google or facebook.
I have a similar issue at my school as well. Chrome is the only allowed browser, and each of us have to use our own school email as our login session in chrome, so we get that much of user space, and that actually works quite decently. I had ublock installed on my user account so far, but if it breaks, I’ll just have to suffer. Although, the real problem is that the school I work in uses some digital books that only work 100% in Chrome, and all show some form of weird behaviour in non-chromiun based browsers. And there’s a 0 chance they are changing it.
Let me tell you why this isn’t fraud:
Teens makes a memecoin on a legit crypto platform (as legit as they can get)
Teens buys X amount of his own memecoin for 350 bidens
People that like to invest on memecoins (aka idiots/gamblers) bought into the coin
Coin value goes up
Teen sees that the X amount of coins he has is now worth 30k
He sells it on a legit trading platform, cashes in on 30k
Because he sold a huge amount at once, market is flooded, coin goes down in value
The other gamblers that were looking into doing the exact same shit got mad at him
I’m not saying crypto isn’t a scam, as memecoins are textbook pyramid schemes (buy in early for low, sell as soon as it’s worth it cashing in on the idiots who bought late), but the way this works can’t be defined as fraud because it’s simply how the whole stock market works.