at first i thought this was an onion article and stephen got melted by the fire

honestly thought this was an onion article. wtf

if the VPN ban doesn’t work then the only reasonable course of action would be to ban the internet entirely. it’s the only way the children can be truly safe.

the mustache binds them

it’s the opposite of Economy Plus

should just be a matter of saying “AI can’t do this job because it can’t properly do any job”. could even make that your email signature.

i’m going to start saying this at every thanksgiving. if anyone questions me i’ll just say i’m the acting thanksgiving director.

the days of slamming are over. it is time to start blasting.

could pringles be the new face of gaming?

god, what a beautiful language. it brings a tear to my eye

i will never forgive C for making the type syntax be

char* args[]

instead of the much more reasonable

&[char] args 

it also bothers me that char* args[] and char c are “the same type” in the sense that the compiler lets you write

char c, *args[5];

with no problems. i think the C languages would be way easier to learn if they had better type syntax. don’t even get me started on C++ adding support for

auto fn_name() -> ReturnType { … }

i’m partial to “eviscerate”. but i agree, i feel like these headlines are just a more clickbaity way of communicating “X says Y” and typically that’s not super interesting. especially when lots of other people are already saying Y.

slamming alone is not enough i’m afraid. they also need to “rip” and “jab” them

mtg would have a meltdown if you asked her what day of the week it is. it’s the only reaction she’s capable of

i don’t know about you but i’m still in 2024. didn’t seem like 2024 would be worth switching to

No crawlers ever go there.

if it makes you feel any better, i would go there if i was a web crawler.

i think that’s fair point. language does work both ways, and i am certainly not in the majority with this opinion. but what bothers me is that it feels like they’re changing the definition of the word and piggybacking off of its old meaning. i know this kind of thing isn’t all that uncommon, but it still rubs me the wrong way.

i think we give silicon valley too much linguistic power. there should really be more pushback on them rebranding LLMs as AI. it’s just a bunch of marketing nonsense that we’re letting them get away with.

(i know that LLMs are studied in the field of computer science that’s known as artificial intelligence, but i really don’t think that subtlety is properly communicated to the general public.)

is “rips” the new “slams”?

i think zuckerberg kissed his ass harder and more affectionately than tiktok did