RDP has some nice defaults that make things easy. VNC can operate pretty much the same, but it takes a bit more configuration.
RDP has some nice defaults that make things easy. VNC can operate pretty much the same, but it takes a bit more configuration.
Weird, I switched to an EV to save money. In my experience they’re wildly cheaper to maintain (no gas, no oil changes, no transmission/gaskets/fuel pump/filter/exhaust/spark plugs/starter/alternator, etc.), and my used EV cost the same as the used ICE cars I was looking at.
Most of the places I charge are free, I’ve saved more on gas than I paid for the car already.
Their refusal to fund his priorities resulted in the longest government shutdown in history.
This is a great explanation, well done.
She’s been pushing for a ceasefire since way before Biden supported it. I think her first calls for it came soon after the conflict started.
To each their own. Personally I can’t stand MS Office, I think Google Docs is easier for most nontechnical people these days anyway. For the rare cases when Office is needed, the web version works fine on Linux.
LibreOffice works great, and WPS Office is proprietary but at least it’s free.
Personally I write my documents in markdown and use pandoc to convert them into PDF or docx or whatever. It’s like writing the source code and then compiling, I like it.
I’m sure you’ve looked into all that, but for anyone else who is interested in alternatives those are my recommendations.
Pfft, proprietary propaganda. How hard is it to let go of every app you’re familiar with, learn half a dozen scripting languages, and memorize a hundred different commands in vim?
What you say is true, though I’ve become so jaded with Microsoft that I don’t think there’s any software or situation I’d use Windows for; I’d sooner switch to Mac.
What do you have against Linux?
It’s not an either-or situation. Vote for Kamala and organize for socialism. Voting is super easy, it just takes a little time once every four years.
I fully believe a socialist revolution will only be made exponentially more difficult under Republican leadership, it wouldn’t make anything better, and it would hurt many people I love.
A 3.5" cartridge slot with a hard drive reader in it sounds kinda awesome, not gonna lie.
She got 60% of young woman voters, but the enthusiasm was much less. Fewer than 20% of democrats said they were enthusiastic to vote for Hillary.
Well we didn’t see that enthusiasm for Hillary so I have no idea what you’re on about.
Also, and I wasn’t expecting I’d have to say this today, women aren’t horses. Additionally, horses are actually pretty egalitarian with their leadership; that’s why they’re such good allies for humans, they don’t mind being led by a person instead of a horse.
Tl;Dr: every part of your comment is wrong.
Also there’s no laws being passed to make it illegal.
Anyone else see the back of the chair as the person’s hair in the first two panels?
That H-O-T-T-O-G-O verse is such an earworm.
It does matter, even if you don’t view it as significant in the broader context. Even from the perspective of starting a communist revolution, the more fascist and conservative the government, the more brutal the suppression.
My personal position is not for one system of government over the other as much as it is for better outcomes for society. I have enough trans friends and relatives that I want as few conservative reactionaries in power as possible.
Since it seems unlikely for capitalism to be toppled before the republican party crumbles, I still think it’s worth working towards, especially when it just takes a single piece of paperwork every couple years to help.
It seems to me like the two versions aren’t mutually exclusive. A better voting system that allows for more parties would undoubtedly lead to more parties winning votes, but such a reform would also run against the interests of the ruling class.
I mean, there’s many nations with more than two parties, including progressive parties, but I don’t see a reason why that’s more in line with the ruling class there than here.
It’s not so much about blame to my mind than it is about the way systems feed into each other.
However you slice it, whatever prior conditions you see as most important, replacing the republican party with one left of democrats would be a huge improvement.
Frankly I’m not sure what the leadership would look like. It would start as the progressive caucus, but it would naturally evolve from there based on the voters.
I think the reason many current ‘progressive’ leaders abandon progressive policies has more to do with our current political paradigm than personal flaws of the leaders.
If there were a progressive party with a progressive base it would make progressive policies key to getting votes.
Be nice, can’t you see they’re only able to afford red pixels?