• 0 Posts
  • 122 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • Ho come on it’s not that simple. Add to that the language barrier. And in general precise language and accuracy are not making knowledge more available to laymen. Laymen don’t have to vocabulary to start with, that’s pretty much the definition of being a layman.

    There is definitely value in dumbing down knowledge, that’s the point of education.

    Now using AI or pushing guidelines for editors to do it that’s entirely different discussion…






  • They say sharing so it’s solely duplicating data everywhere, effectively increasing the attack surface…

    And this would violate my favourite GDPR principle ; purpose based consent. I give my data to the healthcare body for handle reimbursement and I like it that way. No need for them to share that data with anyone else. Same for the tax guy: let him scrutinise the shit outa my incomes but that’s it, don’t share it with the fucking police or whoever else.

    But yeah… this is a difficult topic even in a sane country. We’re talking USA here…













  • It’s the sharing & cross enrichment that would bother me. That your unemployment office keeps a CRM with the info makes sense. That LEA has it all and more together with the gods know what else is what I would object to. Same for how service providers store that info; there’s a fine line between storing enough and too much. Or too long. And not everything needs to be tied forever to the customer ; sometimes a hash or whatever does wonder for the legitimate purpose. Storing more is often « just in case I can market the data later » which I’m personally not agreeing with.