COX: Drug traffickers love gizmos. They love gadgets. And if they have something like, ooh, the app is hidden behind a calculator, they think that’s amazing, and they want to buy it.
TIL drug traffickers have the mindset of a teenage boy looking for ways to hide porn.
deleted by creator
PSA. Send stuff to your local post office and then go pick it up.
You can’t trick me, I know a bullet hell when I see one.
(Not my art)
Find a partner for yourself which looks similar to Crush, replace their wardrobe with virtually identical clothes to Crush, along with haircut, perfume, etc.
Constantly visit shops close to Crush’s house, so it’s “coincidence” when you bump into Crush and Partner.
From there, before they can talk their way out of an awkward situation, joke about how they look like twins, and that fantasy has always appealed to you.
At least they have precident now.
Corrected, thanks friend.
Its basically also why people closer to the equator have darker skin.
You know, from a business standpoint, it makes financial sense NOT to log user traffic.
Reason one: plausible deniability. You can’t give what you don’t have.
Reason two: storage. Why the fuck would you keep logs, when it costs money to?
Reason three: these boots taste fantastic! (People generally don’t enjoy licking boots).
deleted by creator
The problem is that the “thing” is either:
That’s what OP is saying. The wording could be clearer.
Essentially, if you can relate to what the comment says, then downvote.
Never have I ever heard “I’m proud of you” from my Dad :'(
I’m no George Bush fan, but in his defence:
Point 1: the implication is the US are thinking about how the enemy will harm them
Point 2: he is convinced the purpose of war is to establish peace
Point 3: he probably meant "to catapult over the propaganda
Point 4: ya dun fukt up
Point 5: ya dun fukt up 2 George Bush Junioroo
Point 6: (yes, i know it’s hypocritical) he’s right tho lol
Point 7: heh heh
I think that makes you amnesic
Gnostic / Agnostic is simply a claim about knowledge.
I’m agnostic as to whether my bread is stale. (I don’t know if my bread is stale).
I’m gnostic about the planets shape (I know it’s a sphere).
Theist / Atheist is a claim about belief.
Every person fits into one of the following:
A Gnostic Theist claims to know God exists (therefore implicitly believing)
A Gnostic Atheist claims to know God doesn’t exist.
An Agnostic Theist believes in God but doesn’t have sufficient evidence to make definitive claims.
An Agnostic Atheist doesn’t have sufficient evidence to make claims about God, and therefore doesn’t believe.
In terms of rationale, both Gnostic groups make definitive claims without sufficient evidence and should not be trusted.
The Gnostic Theists believe in something without evidence, this is a fallacy, but it’s something we all do every day. For example, I don’t know if it will rain, but I believe it might, so I bring an umbrella.
An Agnostic Atheist is the most rational. If you don’t have sufficient evidence to make a definitive claim, then why would you believe it?
I think they meant the giver.