~$|>>> Onlyfans! <<<|$~

It is impossible to verify the draft agreement, which the Mirror has been given, because it could be a Tehran bid to combat the lies about settlements uttered by Trump.

Even the mirror is calling all sides as lacking credibility, fucking hell if that’s not an indication of how fucked this whole situation is…

Losing 1/5 of your range isn’t exactly a slight reduction. When the topic is “this logistical aspect is underdiscussed” downplaying its importance is somewhat unhelpful, but I do appreciate the sentiment here.

I know, but thanks for taking the time to put that together.

(ah, you edited in the second paragraph - upkeep is lower yes, obviously gas is more expensive than electricity as a fuel, but afaik wear on breaks actually tends to be higher given the increased weight of EVs. This has little to do with the practical longevity of the vehicle, however.)

Nah this is the biggest marketing win they could get. Access remains to the biggest commercial market, but with an official government stamp confirming that it’s Too Good™ ? Absolute win.

I’m planning to get an EV (when I can afford one, who on earth can afford to buy new cars??) but my biggest concern is with battery degradation - it’s improved a bunch, but you’re still looking at 80-85% capacity after 8 years with gentle use - which if the car already just barely has the range I need… nngh. It really doesn’t get talked about and it’s such a huge part of the logistics you need to consider when getting an EV.

Committee on the Judiciary and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government

You realize you’re citing the absolute most insane fascists right now, right? What you’re saying is likely true, but that document is about the furthest possible thing from a credible source.

Ah, but at least he’s really human!

💀 🏆

👉👈😳?

👋

No, I didn’t think you could back your claims up. Thank you for confirming that for me.

And yet, I wasn’t being sarcastic. Do you have anything to back up your claim? Because he has consistently represented himself on this issue, and it fundamentally disagrees with your assertions. I can’t find any reason to doubt him or his characterization of himself - which I want to add, is still not exactly great. It’s just not cut and dry like you’re claiming.

I can’t find a single record of him saying he hated it. Many examples of him being disgusted with his past behavior and complacency with imperialism, but in none of them does he say he hated it at the time. Do you have a source where he claims that?

I think that requires a wilful misinterpretation of what he said to conclude he “very much” enjoyed killing given he expressly says he did not. It’s certainly questionable, but it’s not as blatantly clear as many people are claiming.

“Four tours as an infantryman in the Marines and then Army, did both Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s hard to explain how much I enjoyed combat. It is both physically and intellectually challenging, and incredibly exciting (especially the first few times). I was never a huge fan of killing, at least not for killings sake, but I did love winning and that required killing.”

From his 2015 reddit comments.

It’s an mbin issue, IIRC - it will sometimes just remove links in favor of the images.

Also TL;DR:

[…] an affidavit revealed Michael Dale, 55, paid Rylaarsdam $11,000 to engage in fetish play, asking her to “wrap him up in Saran Wrap like a mummy, glue a pair of women’s boots onto his feet, and pour adhesive onto his eyes to seal them shut [which she did not do].”

Rylaarsdam had not engaged in BDSM acts in the past, and responders discovered Dale’s limbs were bound so tightly during the encounter that he was unable to free his mouth and head, resulting in asphyxiation.

Of course these dipshit systems aren’t fail-safe. Of course they aren’t. FFS…

Two ways:

1. The first is essentially the same thing as the above product, but without dedicated hardware. They can see the precise route you’re traveling and compare that against already extant databases that use security cameras, ordinary highway plate readers or on police vehicles. (They also might just be given it, if you have a car with a SIM card).
2. This is the real method: they have all your PII already, so they just buy & package it. It’s not like it’s a huge secret - it’s pretty widely available info from insurance companies and data brokers if you’re a big corpo (I think you can also get it with a public records request, though don’t quote me on that).

The telcos already offer geotracking as a subscription service to LE orgs tho. It’s genuinely the same thing, except this data will be crappier and need more direct municipal involvement.

… why, tho? Is this just an end run around the telcos, who can already get all that information but charge for it and they don’t wanna pay?