Will be funny to watch him crumble at the first moderately critical question
Will be funny to watch him crumble at the first moderately critical question
Yeah, you’re doing a terrible job. I heard the party you’re supposed to be running has never won an election.
They handed out pillows and had 9 out of 10 employees beat the other 1 to death with them
Remove the subsidies and institute an actual carbon price mechanism, and we’ll see how quickly people begin to switch over.
It’s hypothetically possible that we could hack biology enough to become functionally immortal, but do you really want that? Considering the impact 90 year old Senators are having I’m just imagining an ever more out of touch gerantocracy. Imagine young people being born into a world where no one ever retires or dies, and their opinions are fixed based on what they experienced 100 years ago. Change is good.
Soon it will be possible to cling to the broken shell of what you once were, a mere vessel for arthritis pain and bittersweet memories of a time when you used to be able to walk to the bathroom. Hooray!
I don’t think most people who hear the “fire in a crowded theater” line are going to think it’s about protesting war. It’s an example when speech can have an immediate harmful effect that seems to have a lot more relevance to the discussion of limitations on expression.
Why is anyone still on there?