“I didn’t say you can’t read”
cool, nobody said you did.
“you might have to admit that genocide is wrong.”
If you don’t think genocide is wrong, that is your issue, don’t blame it on some vague “other” that you don’t understand or agree with.
you making mistakes and avoiding corrective information doesn’t mean other people can’t read.
you are wrong.
“Just because you like it, that doesn’t mean it’s not support.”
who told you that liking things means you don’t support those things?
your runarounds are bonkers and inaccurate.
slow down and organize your thoughts, they don’t make no sense.
“Centrists will never admit this…”
centrists, and most people now, agree with both of those things, what are you talking about?
you have a non-argument.
you’re trying to rile up anger by safely condemning the imaginary offenses of a vague minority that you likely belong to.
“If any centrist wants to admit that supporting genocide”
centrists don’t support genocide, and if you think otherwise then you clearly don’t know anything about what’s happening in Palestine or in your own country.
“For the first time.”
you got to read some books. articles, watch an interview or two.
If you are unaware of what’s happening and what people are saying, that is your fault, not some vague political minority that you’re ascribing your insecurities and ignorance to.
no crows will land on you, straw man.
get a rice cooker.
One button. super safe. easy to clean.
there are recipe books about how to use a rice cooker to cook all sorts of stuff (rice, curries, hot pot, soups, pasta, steamed anything)
with that same one button.
after you get comfortable heating up food so that you can eat it, you can try a pan or a Crock-Pot, whatever strikes your fancy.
“…over your head”
Don’t get too worked up, folks can’t help but understand you.
the salient characteristic of your comments is their simple-mindedness.
200 million examples of free speech, according to the Supreme Court.
I don’t hang out with a lot of 13-year-olds.
I guess it’s good you’re learning something from them.
is your relationship with them appropriate?
I’m curious, since the federation seems a lot more geographically decentralized then reddit did.
is there any information on the User-Base by nationality?
some of us were wondering on another thread since there are so many communities in different languages, but I can’t find any way to tell the ballpark nationality percentages of the users here.
you also mention that we don’t know the extent of the voter fraud that occurred, that there certainly was voter fraud, that exaggerated claims of voter fraud are not widespread.
and then the conclusion is to be careful of “conspiracies”.
that doesn’t track.
we’re not sure how much of the rainforest corporations have destroyed.
We know that corporations have certainly destroyed large parts of the rainforest.
therefore, if you hear people talking about corporations destroying too much rainforest, it might develop into a dangerous conspiracy, so report it for disinformation?
no.
voter suppression is and has been a real and significant problem, people should be aware of it. reporting hyperbolic disinformation should be a supportive paragraph to this point, not the conclusion or title, especially when violent calls to action are not a problem on the democratic side…
as you say, hyperbolic claims only manifest sporadically on a couple message boards.
that is not the same as an entire political party simultaneously claiming that their election was stolen and then violently attacking the capitol and the two should not be correlated.
“check to see if the information is accurate” is better advice.
All the way back to bush, conservatives were ramping up removing voting machines from minority and blue districts, purging voter registrations, challenging cosmetic scuffs on ballots, and they did the same thing this election.
votes being attacked and blocked definitely happened, and thousands of votes were blocked in most states that were perfectly legal, but it doesn’t stop conservatives from challenging their validity.
it doesn’t have to be labeled a “conspiracy” if it is a fact.
conservatives can’t win purely on numbers anymore, so they focus on dividing and disqualifying democratic voters.
blocked legal ballots:
purged voter rolls:
yeah, at least that dude cared.
I’ve heard Koreans, Nigerians, Indian immigrants and others(including Latinos) complain about immigrants in real life , but I think the phenomenon is reported about Latinos because most Americans primarily think about immigrants as Latinos.
do you mean it doesn’t correct your misspellings as you type or it doesn’t correct your search terms?
mine corrects my search terms if i type colude instead of collude or something,
" is am a pronoun" gives me “am is not a pronoun”.
there are a few results under that mentioning that “am” should be used with pronouns, heavily implying that it isn’t a pronoun itself.
that’s a tricky search because “am” is such a small and common word, I get more direct results (after the direct answer from duckassist) If I put quotes around am, like
is “am” a pronoun?
sorry it didn’t work out for you, are you trying other browsers or reverting to the googs?
I talk to a lot of immigrants, and nobody hates immigrants like immigrants, and nobody complains about immigrants like Trump.
very idiocracy.
sure, i get it.
he did come up with that half explanation 250 what years ago, so I’ll give him a pass.
kind of a bummer that a half explanation is his most famous 'discovery" even though he did so much
“Netanyahu is committing genocide and we are wrong to sell him weapons.”
I’ve already responded to that in the first comments, which part are you confused about?