Christ, what an asshole.

Christ, what an asshole.

I’d ask you the same question, chuckles, if you hadn’t already agreed with my initial assessment.

No, buttercup, it’s not a bad thing to point out that poor phrasing is poor.

Sure, sweet thing. You literally agreed that the title was ambiguous. How was it “incorrect” of me to point that out?

My original comment was clearly a humorous take on the ambiguity, sport.

Sorry about you sense of humor, li’l guy.

How else do you think I could point out its ambiguity, champ?

You’re right that “ambiguous” would have been a better word.

Anyway, the title is too ambiguous and could have been better worded like the other dozen articles I’ve seen about the exact same thing, which was my singular point the entire time.

Literally everybody but you got the joke, champ.

If only there were some way to make the title less arbitrary.

“Cry harder,” says the only person worked up about a humorous comment pointing out ambiguous language.

Maybe these “professional writers” could take a cue from the dozens of other writers that wrote less shitty headlines about the exact same thing.

My point is that it’s poorly worded.

OK, fine, it’s medium title gore.

It’s certainly some light title gore.

Paywall.

And before any more chucklefucks insist that the BBC has no paywalls:

We get it, you hate your parents. You’ll grow out of it.

How can he be both President and Secretary of whatever specific bullshit this is?

Nero Dork Turdy

*Ron DeSadist