I would never reveal myself because have you met people? I would absolutely be tortured for fun lmao

Haha train go up

Hmm, yes, very wise.

This is an interesting idea. A terrible implementation, but that’s just because 50-100 feral bots can outperform a human on most any digital metric.Things humans can do that bots can’t tend to be really thinky, and so don’t make good, easy checks.

I, personally, believe we’ll be shoved off the greater Internet by bots and malicious automation one day. There’s no solution that isn’t “fight and lose” But yeah, interesting idea!

I just want them to explain what they mean by that :3

I don’t get the joke :(

I daresay no one thought we needed a law against cutting a hole in the wall of a school bathroom. I certainly didn’t have it on my bingo card for this month.

ha, gotem

Maybe look up atheism then try correcting your own comment instead of theirs :)

In all seriousness, I think your definitions are a few centuries out of date. It’s been drifting toward meaning a-gnostic instead of undecided. Contemporarily, it’s used to explain one’s believed level of knowledge on a claim. I can, for instance, be agnostic toward plate tectonics, and be made gnostic of them by evidence.

“Why! Do users! Dislike! The use! Of emojis! On Lemmy!?”

Overused, they’re just so tiring too read. I think, if you’re gonna go that hard, just full send hieroglyphics and drop the text aspect.

“walk the bird” has cursed crossover potential with my understanding of British slang

If you wrote “King of America: Bernie Sanders” on a ballet, they’d throw the whole thing out? I mean, fair. Ballots are no place for having either fun or opinions :(

(If you mean don’t write him in for presidency then yeah obviously but as King?)

Are you aware of medicine? It’s pretty rude to say “im not disabled like you. It’d be wrong for you to not suffer,” as you did.

Now THIS is podracing

IF you define taking and shrinking a corpse’s. head as a violation of the rights of that corpse’s human rights, then yes. Of course, I disagree with most of what you asserted. I guess my first two questions are “Why does a corpse get rights?” and really just… generally… with the moral system thing. If one feels “the environment” is more important than a human, then they should be pro-kill-all-humans?? I’m not sure that tracks. Most societies have a moral system that’s a little more complicated than “destroy everything that’s not the most morally significant to protect it from being hurt by less moral things.”

Anyway, interesting question! Maybe we should talk about corpse rights as a new category of rights? Less important, perhaps, than living humans, but more important than nothing?

…nonexistant?

I’m not sure, but as a woman “with multiple personalities” I can say it fucking feels like it sometimes

add a “spend 0 / balance 50” column

This comment section is exactly what my dumbass teenage brain would have needed to read.

sorry you got downvoted, dr satan. your question is inherently kinda yikes but I had the same thought as a teen. it took me a long time to really get why Affirmative Action != reverse racism.

could you maybe explain why instead of only reinforcing the stereotype? I’d be really curious to know what happens to you between your early 20s and your late 30s