The United States never understood international cooperation, only coercion. Reduced dependency means the world is in the process moving on from being subjected to whims of one country and its subjects.

They ran a “centrist” (lmao) because those are the policies that most benefit their owners.

It’s not even hard, they just don’t want to

That’s right, third party voters and non voters are the difference between winning or losing an election. So the only sensible choice is to learn this lesson and run candidates they would vote for.

Can I take credit for the diminished influence of the US and less arms sales too?

Just because I took your house and gave most of it to a bear it doesn’t mean it’s my fault alright? I told it to behave.

Dude hasn’t been the same since Charlie Kirk upstaged him.

Let’s be fair here, the plan was the British’s. The Nazis just happened to vibe really hard with their plan, just like how they did with Jim Crow.

Alright folks, I’m gonna put my money where my mouth is and illegally immigrate to Epsteinland and vote for her a couple dozen times. Gonna take someone’s job and eat a dog while I’m at it. Wish me luck.

I have a solution.

Actually I have two, but I can only really say one of them.

It’s funny how all these companies produce nothing of value, so they can just change what they do based on what investors are throwing money at.

Bet they’ll have a contract with Lockheed Martin by the end of next year.

So much for the free racist market 😔

This is neat, but comes with a couple of caveats:

1. Even if we can get the quoted 90% utilization (carbon reutilization is notoriously tricky to implement at scale), coal is still pretty bad for reasons other than emissions.

2. That ammonia has to come from somewhere. Somewhere being the Haber-Bosch process, which uses natural gas. Though you could argue this ammonia would be used anyway, just on different fertilizer, which is true, but the point is that this isn’t just a coal-for-fertilizer deal.

This could be beneficial where coal is, for now, the financially viable choice (steel and concrete), or places stuck with it for political reasons (specially with the US attacks on Iran and the oil crisis making coal the only choice in some places). Though I think it’s good to be a little skeptical about carbon recapture cause so far it has disappointed.

Mostly I don’t want coming to the conclusion that coal is clean now.

accused CEO killer

Whatever happened to “defendant”

The tested on the moon part are basalt fibers, which were used to construct the flag on the Chang’e 6 lander. It can withstand extreme temperatures and radiation, so it won’t turn white for a long time. There’s no practical reason for the fancy flag, but the challenge of making it was the point.

You best start believing in the Epstein Empire’s century of humiliation, Miss Turner

You’re in one.

Genocide is bad, wether it’s the Holocaust or the Very Real White Genocide in South Africa. If you have a problem with this statement, it’s because you think genocide is good.

I’m confused, is it the time of monsters or not

Removed by mod