Elected President, election denier
Attorney general, broke the law
Health Department head, anti health products
Department of government efficiency, did terrible business deals
Man this is just too good
Elected President, election denier
Attorney general, broke the law
Health Department head, anti health products
Department of government efficiency, did terrible business deals
Man this is just too good
They’ll be the among the first to die when it comes to health and common sense
Ah I see thanks for clarifying
I missed the joke earlier, lol
New rule? For being a secretary?
Technically you can be concerned about immigration without being a fascist. Fascist doesn’t seem to have a clear agreed definition
Validated voters
Members of Pew Research Center’s nationally representative American Trends Panel were matched to public voting records from national commercial voter files in an attempt to find records for voting in the 2016 and 2020 general elections. Validated voters are citizens who told us in a post-election survey that they voted in a given election and have a record for voting in that election in a commercial voter file. Nonvoters are citizens who were not found to have a record of voting in any of the voter files or told us they did not vote.
In an effort to accurately locate official voting records, up to three commercial voter files were searched for each panelist. The number of commercial files consulted varied by when a panelist was recruited to the ATP. Three files were used for panelists recruited in 2022 or before, while one file was used for panelists recruited in 2023. Altogether, files from four different vendors were used, including two that serve conservative and Republican organizations and campaigns, one that serves progressive and Democratic organizations and campaigns, and one that is nonpartisan.
Additional details and caveats about the validation of votes in 2016 and 2020 can be found in these methodological reports:
An examination of the 2016 electorate, based on validated voters
Validated voters methodology
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/10/10/pre-election-attitudes-methodology/
I believe you gotta go to each survey they’ve done for each of the widget to find out the source. I think they’re all based on the voter registration
I thought it was 3.2M voters that voted from home (via mail), only now I realize it’s absent
Some have tactile markings for location reference, like keyboars have
How is running after individuals and beating them up that may have had nothing to do with this group is justified?
I always thought sports fans could do lots of dumb shit
Definitely quite a bit of hooligans, not an excuse for violence imo
Or we know but don’t think it’ll actually happen
Would those votes have mattered? Last I checked on Nov 5 only 70k votes went to 3rd party and the gap between Harris and Trump was much greater
Why isn’t he running for president? Or he just never won the primaries?
I thought for a sec it was significant
What weight do his own words have in this situation? Talking about his rhetoric in general (e.g. ebemy within, send the army to deal with some ppl, dictator from day one, don’t need to vote anymore, etc.)
If we can just get it to fail completely that’d be great, if that’ll make him a non billionaire
Or just a tool for political strategists that got gamified
A distraction perhaps