Welp. Better late than never, I guess.

Not in backwater Alabama. Gotta wait for the day of.

Could embiggen it by a factor of 10 by removing the gender marker.

The Zionists, whose explicit aims were to found a Jewish state in Palestine (what would later be Israel), were the targets as far back as the Ottoman control of the area.

Even terror attacks such as the Munich Massacre were pretty specifically targetting Israeli expatriats.

Mostly my beef is with the conflation of Jewish and Israeli. They do not represent all Jews, and any conflation of those distinct groups should be put down.

The peasantry?

I think you want the fourth estate.

Murder Jews or Israelis?

If their goal is to murder Jews, they’d have an easier time of it most anywhere else.

Less capable?

Grim news for them if Russia was sending it’s best.

Even if they did, you think they’d get it released? They saw what happened to the Heritage Foundation following the leak of P’25.

Worst of all, I get a vote!

This was my takeaway as well. They’re not agreeing with Smith for any reason other than this nets them more discretionary power.

You have the choice of a conservative who supports more guns, increased aid to Israel, and a more closed border.

Or the party of Donald Trump.

I blame the English for not having accents like the Latin languages.

Who wrote this headline? It should have the events in a more chronological order. Unless you want me to believe that it started burning underwater.

They still are, but they gotta move the needle back there gradually. It’s not in vogue to restrict women to feminine roles just now.

And cats are known for how straight they are.

I know this isn’t what you mean, but it sounds awfully close to “the best thing the Palestinians and Lebanese can do right now is just eat those punches until Israel tuckers itself out.”

Which is quite a take.

Enkidu. Dude was pivotal in providing companionship to the king that stopped, or at least slowed, his general rape and molestation of the lower classes.

The apostrophe as conjunction of “___ is” is acceptable. Eg: he’s being pendantic.

Unless the word being conjoined is “it”.

Desert Storm, Korea, Vietnam all seem to disagree with what I understand that second point to be. US will send troops if it is politically expedient.

Hah, enough money!

He just can’t wring them for more, that’s why he left.