Considering your other reply, I am appalled and disgusted. In addition, it appears to me you have either not read or understood my comment, and I am not sure which is worse.

So … we should’ve hanged all the Germans in '45? The child soldiers drafted in Berlin? Shot the entire Japanese army? Drag all US-citizens to court for acting against the constitution?

I am going to be downvoted to oblivion, but: Lock up all Palestinians for not extraditing terrorists and war criminals?

Where do you think this will go, honestly? How is any of that justified, or fair? Should we commit a genocide of our own upon the Israelis? I know that’s not what you said and I very much hope it’s not what you meant.

This platform sometimes, fuck me.

While I do recognise the colloquial and unserious tone of your argument, I have to disagree wholeheartedly: Human right are universal.

I mean, the plot of Ghost in the Shell sounds pretty close from what I recall: Poor people can only afford cheap bionics, but cannot repair or replace them once support ends.

Not specifically directed at OP, but I am sick of those truncated graphs.

Also, fuck Trump. Not in a goof way.

Considering that the general consensus here already expects that? No. However if you look at the other comments and the downvotes, a significant number of people seem to forget that Palestinian civillians are being ground up between two millstones, not one.

What? Hamas, an organisation seeking to eradicate Jews, may be capitalising on the (righteous) public outcry of Israeli war crimes? They might even be lying? Absolutely impossible, my side ™ could do no wrong! (/s, obviously)

Oh, that makes much more sense now. Thanks, I Could also have just read the article instead of wasting your time :D

So was she a teenager or 22 back then? Confusing …

I appreciate your rambling, but I think you might appreciate some time off of the internet.

Well, I am no expert on the topic, but I guess it could be used to justify some action?

It matters, just not in as much as one might hope. It is mostly a symbolic step, true, because no one will arrest a sitting president. But it shows that the court is observing and condemning the actions. Think of what might come after: Trump couldn’t enter quite a few countries without fear of arrest once he is no longer president. Same with Putin, or Netanyahu. It makes international action so much easier if you can just say “well, there is a warrant out for you, so you better not show up”. Become a refugee? Better not go to a country that might uphold the warrant. Regime change in your current country of residence? Better think fast, the new administration might just need a reason to take you in.

Well, maybe not a moratorium, but I certainly would appreciate some peace and quiet.

That did surprise me as well. I might need to readjust my opinion of him.

Huh, feels like someone in their intelligence service realised “oh wow, you can sabotage infrastructure that way and pretend it was an accident!” and their handler decided to just do that and nothing else. Sure won’t help chinese merchant vessels and will probably damage any relations longterm. Good job, Xi.

“culturual differences” what the actual fuck.

Veterinarians.

This would be close to the maximum possible sentence in Germany, I assume France has similar rules.

Well, thank you for your explanation and the positivity! Always welcome :) Merry Christmas/Kwanza/Holidays

I feel left out, what drama did I miss?