In Canada when I was growing up, if you didnt take french immersion, they made you take 1 french language class a year up until grade 10.
They also taught Japanese in my highschool and for senior year if you’d taken them all you could go on a trip to Japan.
Yes, I was saying that they can and still do what they want, but can/will still face punishment if they decide to do it because individuality has no place in a company setting. Its the company rules that will dictate if they can or can’t do something, and those company rules may also be dictated by laws.
That pharmacist would (should) have faced punishment because it was at work.
The pharmacy no, the pharmacists absolutely, they’ll just lose their job.
This bill is about the individual, so it doesn’t really change anything in this example.
Nothing stops that pharmacist from doing that though, its a company policy that would allow or prevent it.
If the company policy is they can’t refuse then they can refuse and lose their job.
For a small owner run business it could be different though like we wont make you a wedding cake.
Apparently the lidar in some cars can damage cameras and are safe for eyes.
How the fuck am I supposed to play my game of is it a republican or democrat when they put it in the title?
I do pretty good in the game always guessing the same thing.
Hey, so God just told me Im the rightful owner of the world.
Everyone get the fuck off my rock.
Wow that is such an elegant solution! Definitely a principal level solution!
No wonder its been working 3 years.
Well done!
“don’t execute a command in the terminal you found online or were told to run, unless you understand fully what it does.”
We should start littering the internet with bad commands with all sorts of comments saying it works amazingly for its purpose so the AI will keep destroying things if let to run unchecked.
Imagine the trouble they could have saved themselves and others if that’s how they marketed it everywhere instead.
Are you from Europe?
EU has some laws that cause AP to disengage beyond mild turns. It can take some pretty good turns outside EU, but not really sharp ones.
You’re absolutely right that the earnings today doesn’t justify the stock price.
It’s all based off future assumptions that would need to come true like dominating the AV industry and humanoid robot industry.
There was actually a brief period in 2022 I think where the stock price was really high, but they were making more profit than other OEMs combined with a faction of the cars, and they were actually reaching what seemed like a reasonable PE ratio. Then he bought twitter, did the nazi stuff, did the Cybertruck instead of the 25k vehicle (which is now abandoned), and their vehicle growth started shrinking instead of growing.
This case is about AP, but AP does steer the car. The car has TACC and Auto Steer, together it’s called Autopilot.
FSD is the one that can do lane changes, stop for stop lights/stop signs, and all the other necessary things like park and reverse.
They have 44b in cash and 6.2b in free cash flow in 2025.
They make plenty of money and this is a drop in the bucket to their cash reserve.
They’ve paid off almost all their debt as well
So if I read this right
They left the states and couldn’t return because the guys visa wasn’t valid anymore, but Canada turned them away because of the car.
At that point you should probably apply for asylum now and refuse to go back to where you don’t have valid papers anymore.
Or have the person with no longer valid papers walk through if they’ll let you and the other person go back.
Usually that’s about FSD. Its almost never about AP.
I believe he’s even said he thinks FSD is safer than a human now, within the past year. I could be wrong on that, but im pretty sure I remember it. Somewhere between fsd v13 and v14. (Edit to clarify it was his opinion hence thinks, not a outright declaration that it is)
At the time this happened, FSD beta wasn’t even released.
Dang that sucks, I’m sorry to hear that. I’m not saying faulty air bags are okay, they are not. They’ve been the subject of one of (the?) largest saftey recall ever.
Tesla advertised a feature of a car that failed to work in the way it was described.
So first off, this was mainly what I was replying about and I should have probably quoted it. The car 100% worked exactly as described. Any claims about how good AP may be, go 100% out the window the moment your foot is on the accelerator and it tells you the car will not brake.
Also I don’t think he’s ever said AP drives safer than a human, it’s humans using autopilot are safer than driving without it. It’s always because you are supervising it that it’s safer than without. It can’t even change lanes or stop for traffic lights, how on earth could that be safer than a human unless it’s with human supervision?
Tesla wiping/causing problems getting the data should probably be it’s own case (edit brought on by the state or sanctioned by the state or whatever is possible) and doesn’t really have to do with the actual merits of this specific case IMO and whether or not they were responsible.
The working outside of highways is really the only valid thing.
Edit: Let me try putting this another way. Cars have airbags. Airbags are advertised safety devices. If you get into an accident and your airbag doesn’t go off and it should have, you’ll probably sue. If your Airbag warning light was on though, and you ignored it, you can fuck right off on any claims around it failing to deploy or the car not working as advertised.
The dude had his foot on the accelerator overriding autopilot while not looking at the road to get his phone.
If his foot hadn’t been on the accelerator the saftey features in autopilot may have actually worked.
When your foot is on the accelerator, it tells you it will not brake.
The human input should always override these features as they are not perfect and you the human need a way to override it.
Russia has enough nukes that 99% could fail and it’d still wreck your country. It is still a legitimate deterrent and always will be.