NotAnonymousAtAal

All this to a missed knowledge part on myself.

Maybe next time you want to publicly discuss a topic you already know is controversial do some minimum amount of research about what that term actually means before.

Compared to what? And who is enforcing those regulations?

Remind me again, it slipped my mind: How many of those holes are globally completed and in operation legally, explicitly rated for high-level radioactive waste and NOT explicitly labeled as an intermediate solution?

Fair point, but I think it could be managed with the right model. It does not have to be a flat “replace the proven material damages” fine. There could be fixed (large) fines for any kind of significant misbehavior on top the the material damages, multiplication factors can be applied to material damages and adjusted until an effect kicks in, fines can be increased with repeat offenses, …

At some point clubs will just go bankrupt if they don’t take action against this.

Alternatively, instead of fines give them “yellow cards” or “red cards” depending on severity and ban them from the next game(s) accordingly, counted as an automatic loss in the league or tournament. Clubs will care about that a lot, same as most parents who might not care about paying a fine will care a lot about losing their daycare spot, if only for a short time.

I suspect they are not actually in a state of extreme emotional turmoil when these things happen, but they rather just enjoy destruction for its own sake and don’t care about the consequences for others. The sports event is just an excuse.

Similar things unfortunately exist in other contexts, too. Recently I heard of similar behavior in the camping area of large music festivals being an increasing problem.

Make the clubs pay for this kind of thing and watch the problem disappear in record time.

Are you familiar with the term racism?

The AfD will certainly try to exploit this by pretending there is a causal chain that leads directly from immigration of any kind to tragedies like this. No need to do it for them already before they even started.

PS:

Police announced the attacker was a German citizen, born and raised in the country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

So you are saying they are combining nationalist and socialist ideas? Do they classify themselves as a workers party?

Might have heard something like that before somewhere, just can’t put my finger on it.

What the current government is doing on immigration has been judged (officially, by a proper court) as unlawful. They keep doing it anyway, escalating further up the court levels. This is already very close to a constitutional crisis due to the executive blatantly disregarding the judiciary.

What else would you want them to do beyond that? Just give up on the rule of law in general and while we are at it rip up all applicable European contracts?

Maybe we could at least nudge the LLMs in the direction of suggesting appropriate tools and giving hints how to actually do that when applicable instead of blindly brute forcing every task. Of course that does not solve the issue of stupid corporate incentives, but I feel like by now most companies have realized that burning as much money as possible is not a good goal.

something like 80 60% of TikTok is AI crap

more than 90 % of TikTok is crap, doesn’t matter if its AI crap or human crap

Did you find a way to see how many of those credits you already used? To me it looks like they have completely removed access to that information from individual devs and only admins can manually generate reports containing it.

Very useful for hobbyists and prototyping.

True, but that is not the only thing they are useful for; e.g. many high end measurement instruments ship with FPGAs so they can get improvements after release for functionality where implementing it in software would be too slow.

I’m sorry, I usually try to avoid making comments that don’t add anything significant to the discussion, but I can’t stop myself in this case:

LOL

For both tanning beds and drugs there is a significant health risk. In a society that treats health as a purely personal matter, those probably should not factor in to the question of acceptable or non-acceptable harm to others. In a society that treats health as a shared common responsibility, it does factor in because it takes up resources that could otherwise be used elsewhere.

This might also partially explain why healthcare in the USA is the way it is: It is in conflict with the American interpretation of what freedom means.

P.S.: Not assuming you personally are American, but the ideas you expressed are in line with what you would expect from a stereotypical American about this topic.

So do you think selling cars should be illegal, or is “adults should be able to do just about anything they want, even if it harms themselves, as long as it doesn’t harm others” maybe just a tad too simplistic of a rule to decide what should or should not be allowed?

I think adults should be able to do just about anything they want, even if it harms themselves, as long as it doesn’t harm others.

Producing and selling a tanning bed does harm other people.

You can’t prove they are not winning as long as they refuse to define any goals. 🤷