here in the US
Rest of the World: Sweet as. More for us.
here in the US
Rest of the World: Sweet as. More for us.
Bernie Sanders hasn’t achieved anything in his entire useless life.
Look up his legislative record
They don’t work with a coalition to pass law,
Yeah, lets look up some stuff.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders#Legislation
In 2005, Rolling Stone called Sanders the “amendment king” for his ability to get more roll call amendments passed than any other congressman during the period since 1995, when Congress was entirely under Republican control. Being an independent allowed him to form coalitions across party lines
Instead they are normalized
Normalised to what? This doesn’t help.
Each point on the graph is divided by the highest point, 100
There we go. So a spike could be 1 person, or millions of people.
Oh no, I never said that they are only separable by time.
You may not have said it, but you typed it. Lets look at the replay.
And you can equate religions and cults because the only difference between the two is time.
It can’t only be time that transforms the one into the other
I agree with you here.
Ashli Babbitt got shot full on by the secret service
Ashli Babbitt isn’t an example of the USSS taking down a threat. Your source claims:
she was shot in the left shoulder by a United States Capitol Police (USCP) officer.
The USCP isn’t the USSS (by my understanding, which is based on Wiki). I understand that the USSS were present at Jan 6 though, so your point stands.
Religion, cults and sects are as concepts interconnected.
Oh, for sure. These ideas are related, but to claim that they are only separable by time is disingenuous.
And you can equate religions and cults because the only difference between the two is time.
There is more difference than time. Cults require a charismatic, authoritarian leader, religions do not. One can be religious and autonomous in practice.
Religions can be open source and decentralised, cults cannot.
Nah, you’re right to have pointed it out, especially because of the circumstances. No distress here. ☮
Whoops, genuinely didn’t mean to.
“There is no evidence that Bezos favors Trump. Apart from the fact that Bezos favors what Trump supports.”
My brother in Christ, do you read what you write?
Source? I want to read that story and have a laugh.
Edit: I couldn’t find a case where the USSS took on trespassers. I can only find preventative measures.
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/05/07/politics/white-house-construction-trump-biden/index.html
Fellas, is it gay to want a woman that wants you?
Idk what it is about masculinity that loves submissive women
That’s insecure masculinity. Men who are secure don’t need a woman to be submissive. She will be with him by her own volition because she feels safe with him.
Follow the money.
Therapy is maintenance (at the very least). If you haven’t ever been to therapy, you’re driving around without an oil change.
What Russia and every other country on earth now knows is that you cannot trust the United States if you disagree with them
If any country pays attention to US foreign policy, they’ve known this for decades.
I ain’t saying it’s easy. Sometimes it’s simple, but simple doesn’t mean easy.
Yes, because there are ways to avoid and navigate major depression. Better to learn them in times of peace than in the middle of war.
Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.
Sorry, I wasn’t explaining myself well.
Just because a story isn’t factually true, doesn’t mean that it has no value, or negative value. There are other types of values which can supersede factual value:
Truth isn’t always about facts. Sometimes factual statements can be used as a weapon of deceit.
The article claims “in droves” then doesn’t give a number, or even an estimate.