ETHNIC CLEANSING

you know, “mexican countries”

when non existing people have more rights than living people

“Prolife”

Democratic Party of America

That’s the party Zorhan is from. Look for a local chapter and join, they are lively and worth it.

It is an actual concept??!?!

I have been calling it the ratchet effect for years (because it is a ratchet).

Just happy to see someone else calling it that.

Can we stop calling them “immigration crackdowns” and use the proper name for this scale

Ethnic cleansing

it’s valid to support some policies in some places without it making you a fervant supporter of everything that state does.

like I love how china actually invests in infrastructure, including housing and public transit and walkable cities.

I dont like what they do in Taiwan and Hong Kong.

the exploitation industry if writing erotica for the fun of it and putting it online.

would anyone think of the exploited IT workers who maintain the wattpad servers

MAGA

yet here we are

finally a proper use case for this saying

PC culture gone mad

TBH, I got the idea, I knew there’s loads I don’t know, and choose to post instead of asking chatGPT. prefer answer from real people.

do some states have paetial wins? if its 50% each candidate gets half the delegates?

I hate living in a fascist state.

Algebra

Admiral

Algorithm

Artichoke

Checkmate

…

I can’t think about Arabic words that don’t start with “A”. does Arabic has a ban on exporting words that don’t start with “A”.

yhea, the dems becoming right wing is what the donors want, but it won’t get votes

making the democrats a dead party, unless they tell the donors to fuck off.

land of the free, laws specific designed to ban people’s choices.

IT’S THE TRANS IMMIGRANTS FAULT

can’t wait for conservatives to blame the incoming food crisis on immigrants

as an informed she’ll split the vote.

it’s there a way to force a form of ranked choice voting?

she runs for independent, but the votes are for delegates that chose the president, so if she gets 10% of the votes, the delegated should vote for the other less fash candidat, while if she does get the majority she gets the presidency

on top of that, she can make the delegate vote conditional for some policies. so even if she gets 5% of the votes she can dictate the delegates to vote for whichever candidate signs a legally binding contract to do some prewritten executive actions on day one, like abolish Ice. release all imprisonment migrants, grant re-entry visas to deported…

so even if she only gets a few votes, she can have a lot of influence and power.

I just started thinking about this today,and I fear there are more complications. but I’m principle, could this work?