No card slot according to GSM Arena

From the article: Spectrum Mobile and Xfinity Mobile, have launched satellite-based services through a collaboration with Skylo, a non-terrestrial network (NTN) service provider.

https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy

This guys a fucking idiot. And in my opinion, his whole own your accessory game is about collecting affiliate revenue from recommending third-party chargers.

He has written multiple “articles with promoted picks” recommending phone cases and screen protectors for $800 USD or above phone, just looking to add third party chargers to that list.

iirc only pixel 9 lineup has a modem capable of satellite connection.

I had to turn off RCS due to spam and go back to Whatsapp.

Its Google’s version of E2EE. The key is “trust me bro” its encrypted.

On Web and official app(android) there are two pages Discover and Following, by default you will be on “Discover” page. To see post from people you followed, you need to switch to the following page.

I fucking love Flathub(and flatpak too), also thank you to Bitwarden team♥️.

Google Phone app’s spam filter has worked really well for me.

AI is the magic word, if you need loads of VC money.

YouTube app on Android.

Discord

I don’t recall Qualcomm trying to buy ARM.

Thanks for correcting me.

That’d be a more horizontal acquisition than a vertical one as Qualcomm doesn’t make x86 chips so they can at least argue it wouldn’t be anti-competitive.

Not sure if AMD and Nvidia, will see it that way, and they will probably lobby to stop the deal.

Its trying to send spam. Report the link to Google Safe Browsing and move on.

This is never going to get regulatory approval. FTC will move to block the this acquisition.

Qualcomm wasn’t allowed to buy ARM, no way it gets to buy Intel.

Edit :I stand corrected.

It was Nvidia trying to buy ARM.

Heartbreaking: Worst Corporation(s) you know, just made a good stand

Same error for me.

Google meet(original) is the only meet left. They killed Google Duo for this crap.

From the article:

In an email, a GivEnergy representative reinforced Castellucci’s assessment, writing:

In this case, the problematic encryption approach was picked up via a 3rd party library many years ago, when we were a tiny startup company with only 2, fairly junior software developers & limited experience. Their assumption at the time was that because this encryption was available within the library, it was safe to use. This approach was passed through the intervening years and this part of the codebase was not changed significantly since implementation (so hadn't passed through the review of the more experienced team we now have in place).