• 1 Post
  • 27 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle

  • Gecko@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.mlWhy does nobody maintain PPAs anymore?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Jia Tan liked your comment

    Without the traditional distribution workflow […]

    You are aware that the xz exploit made it into Debian Testing and Fedora 40 despite the traditional distribution workflows? Distro maintainers are not a silver bullet when it comes to security. They have to watch hundreds to thousands of packages so having them do security checks for each package is simply not feasible.












  • Fedora has a KDE spin and gets some updates faster than even Arch (e.g. new Gnome releases) while also being considered stable. Heck even the the Asahi Linux project switched from Arch to Fedora as a base recently.

    If you really need something from the AUR you can just use distrobox to generate an arch container and install the AUR package in there. You can then export it from distrobox to your application list with a single comment so that the fact that it’s running inside distrobox becomes completely transparent.

    That way you have a stable but up-to-date base while also still having access to AUR.

    That being said, in my 7 years on Linux I never needed something that was only accessible in AUR but maybe that’s just me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯





  • This. And even then there should be procedures in place to essentially make it impossible to send the wrong inputs.

    It’s like when an intern accidentally drops the production database. It’s not the interns fault for sending the wrong command. It’s the managements fault for not restricting access in the first place.




  • This. I hate the whole left/right tribalism.

    Like I know that it can be used to get a rough idea of what political motivations someone might have and I know that where my own ideologies would mostly fall in that inaccurate one-dimensional linear spectrum but ultimately it is too inaccurate to use it to classify everyone’s political motivation.

    Worse it creates a whole us-vs-them divide. “Oh you aren’t right, when then you must be a commie”. “Oh you aren’t left, then you must be a fascist”. So you might consider yourself in a different position on a political spectrum and just see the differences to someone on the other end of a political spectrum even though you might have more in common then you think. Heck, if you are on complete opposite ends you might even have more in common then you think.

    Ultimately, the focus should be less on left/right and more on individual policies. Like should healthcare be public or privatized, should be build another road or another train track here, etc

    Why does political debate always have to turn into this tribalistic mud fight instead of proper discussion on how to best address the needs of citizens?