Exatron

I can think of one thing he could do that would get him lots of good press, but it’s typically a TOS violation.

It’s also clear that you’re making things up, sparky.

You’re still a tinfoil hat wearing crackpot, spud.

It is if you want to be taken seriously, sweetie.

It’s not unreasonable to ask someone to elaborate or justify their opinion, kiddo.

Wrong again, sparky.

It’s not an insult to us, but they see it as an attack.

Because you’re supposed to bully fascists. He’s a couchfucker.

The AP deleted their fact check, and the whole story stated because of a passage in the first printing of his book. He’s a couchfucker.

Don’t forget the horrors it’ll produce from absorbing the Dwarf Fortress subreddits.

Except they literally don’t. Human memory doesn’t retain an exact copy of things. Very good isn’t the same as exactly. And human beings can’t grab everything they see and instantly use it.

Previous wrongs don’t make this instance right.

The problem is that a human doesn’t absorb exact copies of what it learns from, and fair use doesn’t include taking entire works, shoving them in a box, and shaking it until something you want comes out.

The difference here is that a child can’t absorb and suddenly use massive amounts of data.

How hard it is doesn’t matter. If you can’t compensate people for using their work, or excluding work people don’t want users, you just don’t get that data.

There’s plenty of stuff in the public domain.

It’s not using a computer that’s the problem. The issue is that generative AI scrapes the entire internet to feed its model without compensating, or even asking, creators for using their work.

https://youtu.be/bZ0SRgh3X9Q?feature=shared

So, the more appropriate thing to say would be, “Catholics vs other Christians.”

You know Catholics are Christians, right?

Hospice care just means you’re expected to die within six months the last time you were evaluated.