You would not put it inside the pager if you want to use it as a trigger. You would also not ready-make thousands of those and let thousands of people carry them around.

I pay for “the subscription” and have not used it for anything remotely evil.

Please hit me with some predictions :D

How can a news agency have that kind of power?

They mean 300.

So you predicted that security flaws in software are not going to vanish with AI?

Those that are culturally close to each other.

“after one attack” now that is thinking outside the box. I wonder why they build the iron dome.

Lemmy in a nutshell. Mostly a very specific group of people.

It would skew it even more to rich people. Since… you know… everyone else has to work.

Ah so only rich people can ever be politicians as everyone else simply can’t afford it.

Sounds to me like your standard is just too high. How attractive do they have to be that you consider them?

So instead of letting them free they murder them?

What the actual fuck are you talking about. Hamas murders people all the fucking time, posting videos of their brutal murders etc. proudly online. IDF has no interest in killing hostages, it does not help them, it can only backfire.

This is the report where you got that picture from. On page 44 are the assumptions for storage costs: 100 to 400 MWh of storage, assuming they are charged and discharged 315 times per year (so eg. 31’500 MWh storage output per year for 100 MWh capacity). Those do not need to be 100% cycles, but given that a year has hardly more days than 315 and some days even see no production, they need to be cycled pretty much every day the sun is shining. Anyway, what is my point? We need more than a few hours of storage to make it work. But the more storage you have, the less you actually use it, making it disproportionaly more expensive. Note what they say:

Lithium-ion batteries remain the most cost competitive short-term (i.e., 2 – 4-hour) storage technology

We need more than 2 or 4 hours. A single night is already far longer than that. The shorter the storage duration, the cheaper it is. Of course this skewes the numbers. It is like calculating the storage cost of nuclear waste for only 2 years. Of course it looks better.

Ah, thanks for that detailed reply, let me try: Nuclear is still a lot cheaper.

November 5th 2024? Recently?

Okay and did you add all the extra cost to make that work? Like when talking about nuclear we do not just look at the reactor itself. For example you need lots of storage and distribution to make renewables work.

So even if we assume it is not economically viable… I would rather not have another few billion tons of CO2 just to save some money.

“so-called state”? What…?