

It’s a rhetorical question being asked in bad faith. Stop playing games and state your point, if you have one.
If you got offended by my shitposting, lol. lmao.
Notifications stay off because I don’t play chess with pigeons. The fact that you want to argue about a shitpost with a stranger on the internet named “Dookieman” is all I need to know your opinion isn’t worth hearing.
Downvotes are delicious trophies; I’ve seen what you people like. Keep them coming.


It’s a rhetorical question being asked in bad faith. Stop playing games and state your point, if you have one.


gatling guns weren’t invented until the 1860s
And the first piece of gun control legislation was passed in 1934


I don’t recall claiming it did


There was also the very real possibility the Native Americans, the French, the Spanish, the Portugese, or some combination thereof would invade.


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…
It’s right there in the text. It’s worth pointing out, the second amendment is unique in the fact that it’s the only law in the entire US Constitution where the justification is provided directly in the text. The reasoning and justification for the second amendment were considered that important to the people who wrote it.
It’s also worth pointing out, in the parlance of the time, “well regulated” simply meant “working correctly”. A “well regulated” clock, for example, is one that keeps accurate time.
The founding fathers warned against standing armies because they’re abused by tyrants. They envisioned, in the event the US was invaded, the response would consist of locals, armed with whatever they could procure, organizing to repel the invading force. This was in the days when private citizens owned muskets, gatling guns, cannons, and warships.
People were also expected to make and practice these invasion response plans, like fire drills, but this was never codified because they never thought they would need to explain that to people; it was simply understood to be a requirement that came with the responsibility.
This made sense in a lot of ways. People who know each other will readily cooperate. Locals will be familiar with the local geography, which was a big advantage in the days before accurate maps or quick communication.
Since then, things have changed. A lot. But the amendment has remained. I still think it’s important to enshrine the people’s right to self-preservation and self-defense. But I also don’t feel like typing a 10K word essay with my thumbs today.


Oh really? What other website do the YouTubers I want to watch upload to?


Even if ALL creators band together, IMO there’s basically nothing the creators can do.
Accurate. Even if everyone started uploading to a different platform tomorrow, the catalog of videos already on YT is enough to sustain them for a while


South Park has always been hated by the same people for the same reasons. It’s a fucking cartoon. No one is forced to watch it. I like some episodes, I dislike others. I watch the ones I like, I don’t watch the ones I don’t like. I don’t get what’s so hard about it. If I can do it, other people can do it too.


“AI-pilled” means you.


Bringus Studios. The entire channel is a treasure trove of information for hacking electronics.
Uwos Labs. Run by a former R&D guy. Not exclusively tech, but lots of good information.
Technology Connections remains as good as it’s always been.
Project Farm is perhaps the most honest channel on YouTube. Any time I’m considering a new purchase, I check to see if they have a video on it.
Torque Test Channel is great if you’re into tools and mechanics.


Never accept criticism from someone you wouldn’t take advice from.


Idk then. Maybe a mod deleted it? Maybe OP was banned? Maybe the poster’s instance went defunct?


Yeah, that too. I block the notification element with my adblocker


That just means OP deleted their post. This can happen for many reasons, but the most common is they get embarrassed at the replies, decide they don’t want it on their post history, or they think the downvotes mean something, like on Reddit


Well, what is it doing now?


But all the other forms of market manipulation are fine. Lol


Do you and what’s best for your health. You can’t please everyone. When it comes to some things, if people can’t understand, it’s their problem, not yours.


Do you fully boycott Coca-Cola, Amazon, Meta, Johnson & Johnson, Dupont, Monsanto, Sysco, Chic-Fil-A, and Nestle too? They all donate considerably more money to authoritarian regimes.


If the officers “turned it into” a tool for stalking, that means officers were stalking people with it. Stalking people is a crime. If these are truly “rogue” officers, that means they weren’t supposed to be stalking people, so they should be charged with the crime of stalking.
But they weren’t. And they won’t be.
This is exactly what the cameras are for, this is exactly what all cops are doing with them, and they will continue to be allowed to do it.
My prediction: