And where did I ask that? I wrote: “When half of Europe had socialist leaders, that half of Europe was total shit authoritarian countries that oppressed the population, and prevented progress.”
And that’s what you responded to.
I think you are confused and lost. Not just “here” but about politics in general.
so you’re resorting to wasting my time.
Nope you were. IDK where “here” is, only you know that. And it takes only a second to make a link. Also you wanted to make a point, but failing to provide the link you also failed to make your point.
I don’t really give a shit about your point, and apparently you don’t either.
The one where you write I can read it here.
Your link doesn’t work.
Even (former) US allies can see where the tide is moving, and it’s clearly away from USA, and towards China.
The Iran war already accelerated that process when USA attacked Iran for no reason, and it was accelerated even more within a few days when it became clear that USA was losing. Now it turns out that it only takes a week or two for USA to exhaust their arsenal of power, and the respect for the US military might is at an all time low.
Hopefully the free world will gather around EU instead, and EU and China will work within international law, and establish relations that will create progress on both sides, while USA becomes a lot like what UK is today, after also being a global empire.
Putin is finished, he is a walking dead together with the Russian Empire he wanted to create.
But we need to support Ukraine more, so this stupid war isn’t prolonged more than necessary. When the war is over both Ukraine and EU will prosper.
That’s the consequence of Brexit, I wonder why it took so long?
UK is no longer part of EU, so EU citizenship doesn’t work in UK, Just like a UK citizenship no longer works in EU.
Hurray for Brexit, so much better for everybody. Less freedom and economic harm on both sides. 🤡
My guess is Orban was corrupt from the beginning, but he was hiding it, because that’s what you do.
Of course Hungarians need to be vigilant and take note if Péter is just a repeat, but my guess is that he will quickly normalize relations with EU, and to do that he needs to reestablish democratic values.
I guess we at least agree that Orban is bad both for Hungary and Europe, and hopefully Péter will be a lot better for Hungary first, and for that good relations with EU are important too.
EU is all about mutual benefits, if Hungary think it’s better to stand with Russia,they are actually free to do that, but then they should not be member of EU.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/defendant/netanyahu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICC_arrest_warrants_for_Israeli_leaders
Netanyahu is a wanted criminal for war crimes!!
if you know where does he come from.
I know he comes from Orbans party, but I also know that Orban wasn’t thought to be corrupt in the beginning.
So it seems to me to show character for Péter Magyar that he no longer could stand by Orbam destroying Hungary.
Hungary must I assume have been pro EU to seek membership, and work for years to meet the requirements.
So it seems to me it is Orban that changed, while Péter Magyar maintained his democratic anti corruption values.
no, obviously I’m entirely unaware
You hadn’t yet stated “here” is Hungary, so your sarcasm is misplaced.
Your “easy thought” is very likely emphasized by propaganda, it’s a typical Putin strategy to make an election seem futile to the opposition. And this is right up that alley.
If you had the thought yourself, you might not have noticed it as propaganda, because of confirmation bias.
It’s a childish fantasy that is completely unrealistic, consensus even among a thousand people is impossible and unrealistic.
The only consensus possible is the one that the 1 party communist countries in Europe had before Communism disappeared.
That 1 party system was of course in reality an authoritarian dictatorship. And those that disagree are put in prison. That’s how you create “consensus”.
we can do socialism using a bottom-up, direct democratic, consensus based decision making approach,
OK and what if that approach doesn’t lead to socialism? What you are describing is a change to how democracy works, why would that automatically lead to socialism, and be better than what we have in Scandinavian countries? And exactly what kind of socialism would it lead to?
You are talking like a Russian agent trying to sow discourse. What you suggest has no evidence of working. Social democracy does.
Also a consensus among just a few thousand people is impossible, Denmark that is one of the best democracies in the world, and we have 12 parties represented in parliament. How would you run a country based on a principle that wouldn’t even work for a small city?
It is when at the same time capitalism is demonized with comments like this:
Capitalism cannot be reformed
Much of Europe is social democratic, and that actually works very well by regulating capitalism to prevent exploitation.
When half of Europe had socialist leaders, that half of Europe was total shit authoritarian countries that oppressed the population, and prevented progress.
Very democratic and very pro freedom of speech. /s
Goddam what a shithole country USA has become. 😡
Oh for fucks sake, google it yourself, why is that in any way relevant?
Even if it never happened, it remains the purpose of NATO, because it will definitely happen if article 5 is called, and there is an actual country that is the enemy, and the only country to ever call article 5 was USA. But that was based on a terrorist attack, so a bit of a weird situation.
This is the idiot who led a group of 30+ countries to put pressure on Iran
Your link says nothing of the kind. But instead it says this:
"We’ve been pulling together a coalition of countries … working on a political, diplomatic plan,
So exactly as I commented, European countries are seeking a diplomatic solution, you grossly misrepresented what happened to a degree it was unrecognizable to the reality behind your claim.
You can call it asinine if you want, but you just proved that I was 100% right. And you made a false claim.
From Google:
An official NATO engagement, in the context of military operations, refers to actions taken by NATO-led forces authorized by the North Atlantic Council (NAC)
How would that make any sense while Iran is being bombed by USA and Israel?
Also I never heard about that, so I guess you are misrepresenting what really happened.
What I heard was that Europe was seeking a diplomatic solution. And we are in no position to pressure Iran with sanctions in the current situation. It would be more sensible to lift sanctions to allow the strait to be opened.
One place you claim to be an anarchist, and another you promote Socialism. So no I don’t really think we have much to talk about.
Because neither of those work, and the two are decidedly opposed. You are too far gone IMO.