• 1 Post
  • 112 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2023

help-circle









  • Nuanced take coming, take a breath:

    I agree that Child Sexual Abuse is a horrible practice along with all other violence and oppression, sexual or not. But the attraction de facto exists and has done for thousands of years, even through intense taboos. It seems our current strategy of shaming and ignoring it has been ineffective. The definition of insanity being repeating the same thing expecting different results and all that.

    Short of eugenics (and from previous trials maybe not even then) we might not be able to get rid of it.

    So when do we try other ways of dealing with it?

    I’m not saying generative AI is the solution, but I’m pretty sure denying harder isn’t it.




  • Article is capped at 18 views/day so can’t see numbers.

    But theoretical cap of energy would be something like E_kin = (\gamma -1)mc². Without knowing anything about the mission or engine, a 50 kg probe at a velocity of .9 c means an energy requirement of about 1,0e19 J.

    Fusion of H2 to H3 yields about 340e9 J/g meaning we need about 3 million kg of fuel at 100% conversion rate, or a third if we manage He3 reaction.

    Realistically heating, engine efficiency, deceleration, vibrational damping and such would probably lower efficiency to at most 40% and we end up at 8 million kg of fuel to propel a 50 kg payload (not counting the fuel mass).

    Seems unfeasible.

    Edit as @i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world kindly provided an alternative link.

    Article only says doubly efficient, and H2 to He3 reaction.

    To get to .9c we still need a couple million kg of fuel.

    Even .1c needs about 40 000 kg of fuel, which is doable, but probably unfeasible.

    0,05c should be in kgs range, and is probably plenty (100 km/s).


  • Seems like you’re running in to the same problems the rest of the world has, only slower. You don’t even have to come up with a solution, just steal one.

    Besides, the state retirement fund is only structured that way as a cash buffer, borrowing the retirement fund of a whole generation. You could just as well go back to how it was done in the 70ies with the retirement fund actually built from people’s taxes, and not from the next generation’s - boom, no more problems with uneven generation populations.


  • Why doesn’t the working class, the larger of the two, simply not eat the owning class?

    Jokes aside; seems to me the problem is that policy is set on feelings rather than reality, and then the argument of “not sustainable” gets irrelevant (which is why the policy carries on even though demonstrably wrong).That I can understand, cutting off one’s nose to spite the face kinda deal. But if you’re spiteful, it might be a reasonable (although not rational) choice.

    If you’re looking for efficient and/or rational policy, you need more mature representatives, simple as.




  • Observing groups is a very useful skill, in minutes you can tell who’s where in the hierarchy, what the cliques are, how well they coordinate, how information flows, and where influence springs from.

    This let’s you not only insert yourself at the right moment, peg, and place for maximum efficacy, but also informs you of barriers, challenges to overcome, and next steps for the group to act better together.

    Hobby/skill/interest in Group dynamics, useful for coaching, creating community, project organisation, and group coaching.