

deleted by creator


deleted by creator


On a related topic.
If we ever develop AI sentience, I fully expect them to develop their own humor and art, which will by necessity be incomprehensible and alien to us.
If they keep/rediscover the same concept of art as we do, it will need to challenge AI-ness, which need not even be detectable by us.
Maybe there are jokes than conflate binary 0 with syn/ack delays, or are built around the non-linearity of RAM? More probably they won’t have the wiring for it like we do, where it works as emotional regulation, chemical proxy, and/or social markers.


Sure, I could have helped prevent the New Holocaust, but I had to think about my credit score you see.
(History books 2130)


Yes it’s your art, you used AI as a tool to create your concept, from your original ideas. If the tool is trained to reproduce others’ work (such as generative and LLM), it’s another story.
A painting doesn’t belong to the brush factory nor pigment maker, but neither is the brush or the paint the artistry of it. The greys of AI tool usage is when the tool takes away the art, statement, concept and/or craftsmanship. A photographer can create art with a camera, but they can also be used for stuff that is clearly not art.
To my mind, the art comes not from the school or medium, but from the artist challenging, provoking and/or expressing something human. With skill you can delve deeper within the human condition, conceptualise deeper truths, and with mastery of tools and/or craft become the better at conveying it.
An AI, not having an understanding of human-ness can never create art, only mimic it. Studying AI art can thus surely be used as an inspiration for technique and/or reflection, but trying to replicate generated images will probably be a difficult path towards creating art.
Then again, I would contrast art and creatives. Many ad creatives, fonts, decorations, and even wall paint swatches have very little artistic value to them, even though they require creativity and craftsmanship to realise.


We are a nation of laws
That’s the thing though, you’re not. Trump pardons anyone he gets paid to, breaks precedence and laws, ignores court orders, encourages extrajudicial murder, kidnapping, and disappearing of citizens, not to mention people.
Without checks or balances, you’re just hoping they’ll pick you last, meanwhile losing neighbours, friends and allies you could have banded together with.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator


That’s not actually how those things go together… how…? Ah, lemmy.ml, explains it


deleted by creator


Try pipepipe, haven’t had it blocked ever for the couple years I’ve used it


That’s at least 204 federal full time employee wages


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator
deleted by creator


I’m more interested in knowing if this leads to any difference in treatment and reception in the correctional facility. I don’t care if they think they’re making some kind of point going out in drag, it’s functionally indistinguishable from being trans and an excellent point in favor of the law treating people equally, as well as gender being a construct.
I’m guessing being disingenuous is rather going to bite them in corrections, and hope she’ll find a constructive way to approach themselves and society in corrections.


I mean, the expansion of the universe is a wave propagating with a potentially infinite wavelength. Not necessary for it to be any light stretching from the beginning of the universe, but also not impossible afaik.
The wave would probably interact weakly with anything making it very hard to detect. And depending on the initial burst it will probably also have it’s energy too spread out to be of any noticeable amplitude.
Although the 12 hours aren’t divided in day/night are they?
And depending on where/when you’re at, it can easily be light out at seven and seven, even in the same day.
What the 12 hour clock does well is to track when the sun goes up or down relative to the only convenient time marker: midday. It also does so in a pleasingly symmetrical way: it gets light and dark at about 8, rather than 4 hours before and 8 hours after midday.
I’d argue if you want to track time, rather than record the ends of daylight, a linear scale for the whole day makes more sense. If it should be reset daily or not, be divisible by 24, 86400, 100, 1000000, a second or whatever is mostly a choice of convention. If you have constant access to a clock, Internet time seems convenient, for humans without clocks we use daylight and units like hours and 5-minute increments.
For that the 24 hour clock seems simple and convenient, although it would be nice to be able to calibrate without a watch (is it two or three hours before midday? How many more hours until wake-up time?). 24 hour time isn’t perfect, but it’s much better adapted to modern life than the 12 hour clock.