Bojimbo

I stopped using shampoo and condition once a week. My scalp looks great and my hair is neither greasy nor dry.

It’s also a live telephone poll. This type of pole has a lot of trouble getting a representative sample of people under the age of 40.

Putting international pressure on Taiwan to declare independence is not openly supporting them.

I doubt humane and effective are their goals. We know how to humanely kill. Assisted suicides do not use nitrogen gas or lethal injection. We can put any animal to sleep, but as soon as we are talking about criminals it seems like there is a required minimum of suffering to satisfy those who support the death penalty.

The math would mean they have labeled every post-pubescent boy as Hamas.

I would think combative is closer to your connotation and adversarial is judgement neutral.

Rios, sitting in the backseat of the police cruiser, turned his tirade against Officer Alexander Welch, an English-born American citizen, as the lawmaker pointed out the officer’s accent and bizarrely claimed that he doesn’t think “people from England should be arresting Americans.”

“Your country is being overtaken by f–king migrants and refugees, right?” Rios asked, citing the refugee crisis in England.

“You’re arresting me for driving home. But people come into your country and rape your women. And I’m the f–king bad guy? I’m going to fight for the people of England more than you ever would, you little bitch.”

I’m not doubting you, but do you have any sources? I’d like to read more.

I’m just a simple statistican, but I would be more worried about sun exposure, tap water quality, air quality, processed foods and occupational hazards (depending on job) over 3-4 drinks per year.

The better conclusion is “people who drink in moderation have a decreased risk of cancer”, which is different. Causation is hard to prove, especially when we can only ethically do observational studies. It’s likely that people who drink in moderation are more likely to make healthy choices in other areas of their life or have other factors that reduce risk.

I understand your conclusion, but in my experience not many people are advocating for reducing their 1st amendment rights. The majority of my experience with people claiming free speech is when it doesn’t apply. Like it does not protect anyone from being laughed at, ostracized, does not force people to buy goods or services from someone who says wild shit, and no one is required to give them a platform.

People only invoke the feelings of the founders when they either don’t have a stronger argument or are trying to appeal to conservatives. It’s basically religious interpretation at this point - mostly used to manipulate people who don’t know better.

I think weak labor protections for a people that commonly live paycheck to paycheck with health insurance from those jobs, poor social programs should they lose those jobs and a police force that has a robust history of violently shutting down protests might also have a hand

Some pregnant women get outies in their second or third trimester, so there must be an amount of force that would do the same.