• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 13th, 2024

help-circle
  • Possibilities are all possible outcomes of a certain scenario. With the example of a coin toss, it’s heads or tails. However, these are dependent on your definition of what you want to observe. For example, at a dice roll, you could define the possibilities as:

    • any number less than 5 is rolled
    • a 5 is rolled
    • a 6 is rolled

    Probabilities are attached to possibilities. They define how likely an outcome is. For example, in an ideal coin toss heads and tails have a probabilitiy of 0.5 (or 50%) each.

    With my 2nd example, the probabilities would be:

    • any number less than 5 is rolled: 4/6 (or 2/3 or 0.666… or 66.666…%)
    • a 5 is rolled (1/6 or 0.1666… or 16.666…%)
    • a 6 is rolled (1/6 or 0.1666… or 16.666…%)

    All probabilities must add up to 1.0 (or 100%), otherwise your possibilities overlap, which is generally not something you want.


    Plausibility is a bit more tricky, as it also depends on your definition, namely a cutoff point. You could see the cutoff point as a limit of how much you want to risk. I’ll only examine the example for the coin toss for that. Say you will toss a coin 100 times. This would mean there are 2100 possibilities, but we will examine only 2 for this matter:

    • you will get 100 times tails
    • you will get as many tails as heads

    Let’s say the cutoff point is 0.01, i.e. 1%. This would make the first possibility improbable, as 1/(2100) is far lower than 0.01. The second possibility is 0.5, which is greater than 0.01, and therefore probable.


  • But do you also sometimes leave out AI for steps the AI often does for you, like the conceptualisation or the implementation? Would it be possible for you to do these steps as efficiently as before the use of AI? Would you be able to spot the mistakes the AI makes in these steps, even months or years along those lines?

    The main issue I have with AI being used in tasks is that it deprives you from using logic by applying it to real life scenarios, the thing we excel at. It would be better to use AI in the opposite direction you are currently use it as: develop methods to view the works critically. After all, if there is one thing a lot of people are bad at, it’s thorough critical thinking. We just suck at knowing of all edge cases and how we test for them.

    Let the AI come up with unit tests, let it be the one that questions your work, in order to get a better perspective on it.




  • I do agree that password managers are generally more secure than memorable passwords, however, they also pose he Achilles heel of a system, as one password unlocks all. That is why 2FA tops everything, as even with a weak password, as a hacker would need to crack an OTP to gain access, or convince the one holding the 2nd device to unlock the account for them.

    However I do want to contest the claim that all user-friendly passwords are inherently unsafe. The Electronic Frontier Foundation did a Deep Dive on randomly generated passphrases and shows how secure the system is by entropy alone.


  • Blemgo@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldX launches E2E encrypted Chat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    I’m not the one who you asked, but I’d still give some feedback of my own. Musk as a person is a difficult character. I would even go as far as calling him narcissistic.

    • He got thrown out of PayPal for his incessant micromanagement and disruptions to the flow of the company
    • he bought himself into Tesla to replace the CEO with himself
    • he tends to depict himself as one of the greatest tech geniuses out there, yet often the plans he presents to the public are often poorly thought out and serve no other purpose than to show his “talents”
    • when his proposal to build a tiny submarine for the Than Luang cave rescue was shot down and a British diver was chosen instead he resorted to call the diver a “pedo guy”
    • his latest attempts in politics, especially concerning DOGE feel completely half baked and, again, how he presents himself in his position feels more like an ego trip than something more reasonable
    • he publicly had talks with the controversial German political party “Alternative für Deutschland”, which are currently legally considered “assured right-wing extremists” and have had a history of having Nazis and Nazi sympathisers in their ranks

    I generally can’t trust someone who seems to put himself first at everything to handle anything related to security when the role allows him to exploit it for his own gains. And I do not trust someone who supports political groups known for trying to oppress minorities to defend actual rights for free speech.


  • Blemgo@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldX launches E2E encrypted Chat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    The question is whether this actually is E2EE, as it’s easy to fake by using a man in the middle attack and hard to prove. The only real way to prove it for sure is to run a third party security audit, like Signal does.

    Taking down the old system doesn’t inspire confidence either, as this downtime could easily been used to interrupt old conversations in order to implement a way to decrypt the messages on the servers before passing it on to the actual recipient, as all keys would have to be re-issued.