You’re right, chemistry was not your strong point. The sugars produced by photosynthesis are the ones that get turned into coal and oil. Plant respiration actually is the reverse of photosynthesis (it’s essentially human respiration) and is done for exactly the same reason that humans use it for, to produce energy for use by the plant. A plant just does more photosynthesis than respiration, which causes it to grow over time as it accumulates carbon based molecules and stores them.

If you take the holistic view, servers are already powered by photosynthesis. It just happens that most of them are powered by photo synthesis that occurred millions and millions of years ago.

Removed by mod

Because it hasn’t been trained on significant amounts of dialogue as a primary source for speech patterns. It also isn’t meant to be distinct unless the instructions make it distinct.

Canada restricts hate speech, as does most of Europe.

Yet its the US with the speech suppression issues going on right now.

History loves to repeat itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite

Some back of the napkin math says about $50 trillion dollars in value for the top 1% in the US. That would pay off the whole US Debt of $40 Trillion, with about $10 trillion left over.

However, there’s a caveat here. Given that’s about 3.5 million people (1% of the US population) that only works out to about $14 million dollars each.

While that’s a lot of money, it’s not really an egregious amount of money. If you limited the 1% to keeping say $10,000,000 each (get rid of the obscenely rich) you would only have about $15 trillion dollars, which doesn’t even pay off half the debt.

What defines an ethical company?

That’s an example of a false choice.

The most practical distribution is actually a mixture of the three systems divided up based on industry and other factors.

There is no reason we can’t have communism for the food industry, socialism for housing, and capitalism for clothes and movies.

Marx while influential isn’t the defining authority.

I was going to say a human can’t carry it, but yours is good too.

Now THAT’S a stupid question.

Good Job.

The answer to your first question is yes.

Children don’t get to set their own boundaries, that’s why we consider them children. Once they’re ready we call them adults.

If I allowed them to set their own boundaries, they’d probably already be dead. They get some pretty stupid ideas sometimes.

I’m laughing so hard right now.

You’re so idealistic. When you grow up and join the real world you’ll realize that what you said was funny too.

A) You clearly don’t have kids.

B) If everything they did as parents was perfect, people would have felt it was unreal, more so than even the super powers part.

C) It’s a TV Show, conflict and drama keeps people paying attention.

D) Homelander… there may not be stupid questions, but clearly there are stupid statements.

100% inheritance tax on any value over 5 million, and slam shut any loopholes that get found.

Force them to either spend it stimulating the economy or give it up to society directly.

The whole thing with religion is not needing to prove or justify anything to other people.

It’s a social “team” and teams need goals to exist.

When it wasn’t the Gays or abortions it was something else.

The crusades are an obvious example.

The church has cycled through enemies for the entire time its been around. Hell, they even split the religion into different religions just to have someone to play as the “other” and to consolidate power under new leadership.

There’s almost no support for PD that high yet across devices. It will definitely take some time to roll out. The only laptop I know that supports it is the Framework 16, and it requires an extra purchase of a $150 charger.

If you shout MAGA enough times, I hear it summons a direct connection to the Truth.

You have no proof, your assertions aren’t backed up by any sort of actual logic.

There are groups like META who spent MORE than AIPAC in 2025, and congress is still handing them their asses, so clearly just funneling money to congresscritters isn’t sufficient to directly buy them off.

and you’re still not offering a realistic alternative.

I want people to stop killing each other. If it means genocide (displacing people) to prevent more genocide (killing people) as a REALISTIC answer, then yes. That’s what I want to see happen.

Nobody else here giving any real answers other than wishful thinking.

Do you really believe, that if everyone stopped supporting Israel and they lost all basic ability to hurt anyone, all the groups that are attacking Israel are going to magically stop.

Do you actually think that’s what would happen?

If you do, I have a bridge to sell you.