

Neither protecting or serving are actual job requirements.
Neither protecting or serving are actual job requirements.
Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the train and when I saw this I had to start furiously masturbating. Everyone else gave me strange looks and were saying things like “what the fuck” and “call the police”. I dropped my phone and everyone around me saw this image. Now there is a whole train of men masturbating together at this one image. This is all your fault, you could have prevented this if you had just tagged this post NSFW
Funnily enough, I was going to make this same comment. But then I saw that the serving size is 41 g with 12g of sugar so…
I have no idea why the west is so ok with Japan’s ranked competitive racism…
The “reverse” here is in the context: “parental controls” is conventionally allows parents to restrict offspring.
Based on the CSMS statement elseware in the thread and my limited google-fu, it looks like swicth one was 9504.50, which isn’t on the list of exemptions.
That said, I wouldn’t be too surprised if Nintendo figured out a few tweaks in the feature list that would allow them to claim it as one of the exempted categories.
Are you willing to go down for your country?
These big propaganda stations broadcast in dozens of languages.
Apparently there’s some huge drama in data hoarding communities about manufacturers switching between different recording technologies, and how everybody is worried that they aren’t going to last for 5-10-100-1000 years.
I cannot for the life of me find it, but there was an article before the modern explosion of ML into the public consciousness where a guy found that one of the big search engines offered an API to “rate” nsfw images on a numeric scale. The idea was that site admins could use it to automatically filter content with a bit more granularity.
So naturally, he trained a naive image generating model with the nsfw score as the sole metric of success, and got results much like you describe. Results were pretty much “what if Dali and kronenberg had a baby with slaanesh?”
The practice you describe is explicitly illegal in almost all employment circumstances in the United States.
Nobody has a problem censoring hateful and harmful content, so long as they’re the ones that get to decide what that means.
As someone with kids: they should not. This kind of basic flexibility should be the bar for all employees, regardless of family status.
You can’t vote for those things because nobody is actually offering them. That’s the point of the student council analogy.
The other side of this I’ve seen is vendors setting the price to really high levels when out of stock. I’ve heard this explained as “the algorithm will punish you” for going out of stock and “if someone places an order, you can always scalp one”
Yeah, the fucking idiot will probably all blow it on something stupid like an ER visit.
Either at the start of each word or to accentuate each syllable.
Adoptive 👏 parents 👏 are 👏 real 👏 parents 👏
But yeah, he definitely saw Johnathan slamming that midwussy.
Or a Porsche. Or a Bentley. Or a laborghini. Or a Bugatti.