While other new students fretted over the university’s rigorous core curriculum, described by the school as “intellectually expansive” and “personally transformative,” Lee used AI to breeze through with minimal effort.

Lee goes on to claim everyone cheats. (He’s also that AI Amazon Leetcode interview person.)

Lee said he doesn’t know a single student at the school who isn’t using AI to cheat.

Well duh, what other kind of people would he know.

Yeah, I understand. 🤗

When I asked him why he had gone through so much trouble to get to an Ivy League university only to off-load all of the learning to a robot, he said, “It’s the best place to meet your co-founder and your wife.”

it’s been heading in the opposite direction, fortunately, if collegeboard is to be representative

My habits don’t carry a threat from supernatural forces if someone else doesn’t follow them

Well why do you follow it, then? The reasons for that also apply to the reasons for superstitions.

You made a bad faith argument

I don’t understand how it is bad faith. Assuming something doesn’t have to be logical is no less unmoving than assuming it has to.

there is no way a human could comprehend anything beyond our universe, and pretending you can is just a lie

I agree. And I simply do not believe any of us can decide whether God exists or not, since that is also a comprehension. That doesn’t mean we can’t decide which comprehension we believe in more, just like we pick and choose the morals we prioritize.

pretending you can is just a lie, a hypocritical act

Finally, as I’ve said above, “lies” don’t have to be hypocritical.

It has to do harm in itself to be an illness. Don’t tell me you don’t have your own little rituals and habits.

Faith doesn’t need proof: it’s not logical, meant to be logical, nor applied in science (and nor should it be). That does not mean it’s hypocrisy.

Not religious but that only sounds like glorifying God instead of vain to me. It’s thanking God for what we have, no?

Very far from all of them, but indeed too many sects are

That’s “narcissists”.

https://fedia.io/

I’m guessing the concern is “the feds”, a pejorative term to refer to undercover police?

lol no problem

This Private Search is just a standalone website (and not part of the browser). And yes, Waterfox the browser does support WebExtensions, as it includes Firefox Quantum features.

the search engine, a website?

these jokes get me every time. last time someone said something like “earthfox, airfox, lived together in harmony…”

I use it for the default interface customizations and tree-style sidebar. I personally don’t care that much about the very basic level of Firefox’s telemetry, but yes, Waterfox bundles the Betterfox config to shut down trackers plus overall just make itself faster.

I know prohibiting reselling is what they probably intended. But that doesn’t mean they can’t push a different and very valid interpretation when they want to.

you’re not just reselling openssl.

The wording—“primarily derives from”—is much broader than “just”. I believe that Resque’s dependence on Redis is enough to satisfy “primarily”.

To be fair, it was introduced as meta-search in the Waterfox changelog where it was publicized.

I feel like it qualifies under

offering a service the value of which entirely or primarily derives from the value of the Program or modified version

Doing it fast is essential and a core part of many services’ value, I’m sure.

You have a point regarding the FAQ but I do not see that written in the license. This is a problem that would only be granted in case MongoDB/ElasticSearch/Redis sues someone for internal use and I think that’s a borderline risk too much to take.