• SexyVetra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My neato.

    Guy replies with a hyperbolic shitpost about capitalism.

    OP replies sincerely.

    I reply hyperbolically in turn.

    You assume I’m serious, then assume media can only mean “the mass news media” while ignoring any subtler parallels about access to information and adoption. (e.g. Does reading and writing being expensive relate to the early internet where access and hosting were expensive? Does the evolution of the written word have parallels with the evolution of the internet?)

    If I’m responding semi-seriously, I do want to note that it’s only in the American school system where there’s no writing until the west gets paper. Armies of scribes carved into stone, impressed into clay, and wrote onto vellum to blanket empires in written news.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Armies of scribes carved into stone, impressed into clay, and wrote onto vellum to blanket empires in written news.

      Yes. This semi-happened elsewhere. But this isn’t for the “people”. These were for the rich and powerful and the government.

      And I’m sorry if your shitpost wasn’t understood. As has always been the case, text is not a great medium for conveying sarcasm. We did invent /s for that reason.

      • SexyVetra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “No! There are absolutely no parallels between the written word and the development of the internet,” you growl through gritted teeth. “And while the stone markers distributed with text in several languages including that of the common people and placed in gathering areas did provide news to the people, it only carried the news the royals wanted them to now about,” you finish triumphantly, not realizing that proves the point being made.