Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.message-squaremessage-square158linkfedilinkarrow-up1630arrow-down152
arrow-up1578arrow-down1message-squareIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square158linkfedilink
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·1 year agoAnd dems demonizing gun ownership. Seems it worked out great for the right (er) wing.
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoNo, it really didn’t benefit them in any meaningful way. Widespread gun ownership has gotten an enormous number of innocent people killed though.
minus-squareM0oP0o@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWell in the states yes, since it is seen as some sort of right and not a privilege that requires basic safety training. The rest of the planet seems to be more sensible.
And dems demonizing gun ownership. Seems it worked out great for the right (er) wing.
No, it really didn’t benefit them in any meaningful way.
Widespread gun ownership has gotten an enormous number of innocent people killed though.
Well in the states yes, since it is seen as some sort of right and not a privilege that requires basic safety training. The rest of the planet seems to be more sensible.