Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.message-squaremessage-square158linkfedilinkarrow-up1630arrow-down152
arrow-up1578arrow-down1message-squareIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square158linkfedilink
minus-squarewewbull@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoWhat makes you think they didn’t have guns?
minus-squarenBodyProblem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down6·1 year agoNever suggested they didn’t. I’m suggesting that the country would have been better off if they both had weapons and chose to resist. We aren’t Germany. The founding fathers made sure we could arm ourselves. The choices we make are our own.
What makes you think they didn’t have guns?
Never suggested they didn’t. I’m suggesting that the country would have been better off if they both had weapons and chose to resist.
We aren’t Germany. The founding fathers made sure we could arm ourselves. The choices we make are our own.